I notice that when we do player comparisons, we always do the top tier of NBA players, the superstars. Well what about the players in the NBA that are well, suck at playing. As we all know, the NBA is full of underachievers that get overpaid, mostly at the center position. So the question is, who would you rather have, Michael Olowokandi of the Boston Celtics or Jerome James of the New York Knicks.I'll post mine later.
Kandi manIt just seemed like Jerome James wanted the money. But he does have talent. He need to consistantly show me at least some good play for me to choose him.Kandi because i seen how he played in that past.Jerome James is younger but still pathetic for a young player
jerome james is young now? he's 30. james i think was always horrible. he showed some good play last year in the playoffs so he has the potenitial to be good. the kandi man certainly has underachieved. he was a number 1 pick and i thought he was gonna breakout when he got traded to the twolves. instead he was just bad so my vote is jerome james.
This is one of those none of the above answers. If I had to pick one I would probably reluctantly go with Olowakandi just because James is a fat, overweight, lazy piece of <Censored>..Olowakandi is too, just not as fat..
