Except it didn't. I know you want to believe it did, which is why you're ignoring evidence to the contrary, exactly as I said you would. You're not actually trying to do anything except support the world view we already established you have. You're trying to argue about points which don't matter to make it personal rather than looking at all of the data to inform your stance. You are wrong. It's okay. We already knew that before we got into this.
i fucking quoted it directly from the article you linked. TWICE!!!!!!!!! you are sooo lost. Don't know what else to say when i quoted directly from the article you linked….. Have good day trumper.
Your claim insinuating the protesters turned the criminals in. Your first link. Attempting to back up the above claim. what the actual article said that does not back up your claim at all: Agents with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives say they saw Bass squirt an accelerant on the main entrance of the Portland Police Bureau’s Central Precinct, which is part of the Justice Center, setting fire to thedoors and an awning, court documents state.” “OB drops the mic”
Yeah, that first link showed one of the citizen reporters (often referred to and assaulted as protestors, or even antifa) supplied the video. The second link which you chose to ignore showed that specific protestor/reporter/antifa being attacked by a right wing nut job. The second post on the topic, since you had a problem with the first clarified the position that an informant at the protest (not anything about an agent) was instrumental in identifying the arsonist. So again, as much as I know you want to focus on unimportant details to try and support your narrative and typically get lost in the weeds as a result, my claim that protestors (or citizens at protests) identified arsonists and supplied evidence to the police gas been fully supported. All the other bullshit you've spouted is just exactly what I said you would do. Thank you for proving me right.
This is the complete article of the first link you posted. Can you please show me where it says or shows what you claim in the bolded above? Portland protester guilty of arson sentenced to 48 months in prison Conrad Wilson (OPB) July 20, 2021 2:29 p.m. A protester who pleaded guilty to arson and throwing a Molotov cocktail at police during a Sept. 23, 2020, demonstration in downtown Portland was sentenced Monday to 48 months in prison. Cyan Bass set fire to the Multnomah County Justice Center and used a slingshot to damage some of the building’s windows, according to court documents. Agents with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives say they saw Bass squirt an accelerant on the main entrance of the Portland Police Bureau’s Central Precinct, which is part of the Justice Center, setting fire to the doors and an awning, court documents state. Agents say they also saw Bass use an accelerant to light part of a boarded-up section of the building’s north façade. Later, two ATF agents say they saw Bass light an object on fire and then throw it at a line of uniformed police officers. The flaming object did not explode, court documents state. Last month, Bass pleaded guilty to a single count of first-degree arson as well as criminal mischief in the first degree, attempted assault in the first degree, unlawful possession of an explosive device and one count of rioting. During that same Sept. 23 protest, another Molotov cocktail thrown at police exploded. The Multnomah County Distinct Attorneys Office and the U.S. Department of Justice have filed charged against another protester they say is responsible for throwing those devices. Where in that article does it even come close to insinuating a protestor turned the criminal in??? since im soooooo stupid with my head up my ass, please specifically point out where it backs up your claim?
Oh no. The case has been made and you dropped your mic. It's over. I've already explained it thoroughly and you're choosing not to understand because I've once again called you out for your bullshit, and you're taking in personally. Try clenching. It'll tighten the seal.
lol. So what you are saying is you are unable to point out specifically where it says protestors turned in the video that got the criminal arrested. You aren't able to specifically point it out??? yeah. No wonder why i dropped the mic. Lol. See that spin? Looks much like a toilet flush…. Point it out. Come on. Highlight it and show me??? Come on now. You got me right? Own me now. Specifically bold and highlight in that article where it says a protestor turned a protestor in. Ill be waiting…. A Long Long Time…..
That's already been explained at length, but you're choosing to ignore it. So no I'm not interested in entertaining your delusions further.
It's going to be fun watching you two navigate Super Bowl Sunday and Valentine's Monday. You're both going to need a lot of booze.
Which post? Can you even repost it so i can see specifically which post you claim its been explained so i xan then dissect it and ask you where? you keep claiming its been explained and it has not. but thats typical of you and your “evidence” show me in that article where it says what you claim it said. Or ill just consider this more bs. Consider me dumb. Point it out to me. Show me. Bold it loke i did. Quote the specifec secrion like i did. Not your personal bs sxplanation. Until then you are just posting tbings full of shit. you have yet to pinpoint any part of the article that specifically validates your claim. I did my part and pinpointed things but apparently you explained in detail without one quote or bolded section not stand out and specifically confirm your claim. nice try trumper!
here are your posts supposedly explaining how a protestors turned in a criminal. now bold and highlight the specific section please. If you are confident its there then this shouldn't be an issue at all. If you are not willing/able to do this and claim whatever, well then we know who's is bullshitting and who isnt. you made a claim and sited a link to back it up. I opened the link and specifically showed you where it doesn't state what you claim aNd pointed out what if DID say. I soecifically bolded and itizied for it to be clear and stand out. Explaining as best as possible. if you are not willing to go through the same exercise to provide clarity… Well then ive lost all respect. Dont come at me saying im playing typical games when i actually made a point to address the specifics of your claim and link and you have yet to do the same in retune but just made opinion excuses. You haven't proven shit to counter the specific points i debunked in your claim.
I need a lot of booze and I need it now. Thanks to the married couple in here who have broken my vow of sobriety. Thanks You Two. Thanks to you two I now relish my return to heavy drinking and all that it brings into my life. Tell me again which one proves how wrong they are.
LMAO! I've already done it. I posted 3 links in 2 seperate posts which backed up my claims. I don't need to counter whatever bullshit you're bitching about. The links backed up my claim. It makes you look bad for implying there was any similarity between Jan 6 and the Portland protests, so I get that you don't like that. It was a silly position for you to take. Throwing a fit isn't going to change that.
so all you really said is there is nothing in those posts above you can pinpoint that backs your original claim i clearly debunked with quoted sections of the first link you provided. Thats all you had to say. You cant pin point and bold out the part that validates your claim. Thats all you had to say my man!!! All this drivel about throwing a fit is just more deflection that you cant clearly mark out in the link i debunked by quoting what was in the article. If you aRe right, then this should be a very simple request. I just looked again and there is not one bolded point or direct quote of anything in your links. I opened the first and showed you how it dodnt say what you claim. So now its up to you to show me. Im not wasting more time on more links that may or may not show ouur point. I already debunked the first link. Clearly. So now if you want me to get your point, point it out!!!! Don't tell me to click on more links. Bold your point. “Quote a direct section if one of your links proving your point.” You haven't done either at all in any of the posts above. Instead of making it clear, you want to talk about me throwing fits because i debunked your first link. Straight up. What a waste of time on a bunch of satire if you cant actually pinpoint in any of your posts anything to valifiy your claim.
Let's go with that. I'm certainly not Valley Girl approved... Except maybe when I dress as Santa... I'm not sure... Do the valley girls who have the Santa fetish actually want a fat guy? Or just the outfit?
