Trade #1: We know that GMs have been asking about Sean Williams, although I know he is considered untouchable, but ... Would you do this trade? Boston Kidd trade - put Kidd on a team with an awesome record Kidd wants to be on a contender. Well Kidd would join two Allstars in Paul Pierce and Ray Allen, and Boston has a 20-3 record on route to be #1 in the East. Trade #2: Or how about this, Hornets Kidd trade - Save New Orleans some money We know New Orleans' owner is cheap, the Nets take on Chandler and David West's long contracts. Magloire is reunited in New Orleans. Kidd has a big contract but less years than Chandler and West. New Jersey has to give up Sean Williams and Krstic as some young talent with small contracts. They also send some cash and a #1 pick to the cheap New Orleans owner. NJ starting line: PG: Chris Paul SG: Vince Carter SF: Richard Jefferson PF: David West C: Tyson Chandler Trade #3 Knicks Kidd trade - A change of scenery? Maybe a change of scenery would do some good? Kidd finally has a coach who knows the game well being a 2-time champ. It would definitely spice up the competition between NY and Nets, the Nets lost the first to season games to the Knicks, maybe Marbury can change that. Trade #4 Phoenix Kidd trade Kidd returns to his beloved Phoenix, and is happy being on a contender. Trade #5 Lakers Kidd trade - give Kobe what he wants, without losing Bynum Kidd gets to be with Kobe. Collins contract is gone, get a talented Odom at PF, Turiaf is an energy guy, Kwame can defend centers and rebound better than Collins. NJ line: PG: Farmar/Marcus/J-Critt (Keep the two that develop best, trade the 3rd) SG: Carter SF: RJ PF: Odom/Turiaf/Krstic C: Kwame/Sean Williams
I like your hustle but most of the guys you listed are pretty untouchable. Why would Boston trade KG for Kidd? same goes for Chris Paul, Tyson, Nash etc when their teams are winning. Only contenders who never reached the promise land would want to take on his contract so that leaves; Denver, Chicago, Cleveland, LA Lakers, Houston and Dallas.
Sorry, dude, but I doubt any of those trades would happen. Highly doubt it. Oh yeah, and prepare to get laughed at by any Boston fans...they love KG, and would never even think about trading him now. Of course, I don't blame em.
Some of those trades i dont even think would have gone through on 2k8, let alone real life. Kidd and Mailk for Amare and Nash?????? Never the only ok trade was the laker one which was ok im meen these trades help the nets a lot but still.
All these trades seem quite unrealistic. The Hornets would never give up Paul, and I don't think the Nets would give Kidd, Sean Williams, and RJ for one player. These just don't make too much sense.
Nash and Amare for Kidd and Malik. That one was without the best. And why would Boston trade away KG? Same goes with Paul?
yeah, I was laughing out loud on the Kidd for Amare+Nash trade. But as long as we're throwing out insane proposals, here are mine that may or may not be insane, I'm too insane to tell myself. Kidd to Denver, 3 way trade Kidd to Chicago Kidd+Carter to Houston
everyone one of those trades is god awful 1) Boston is what 21-3? They don't trade anyone...plus Rajon Rondo is playing out of his mind at PG 2)New Orleans has a great young trio in CP3, West and Chandler...why trade for an aging PG unless you have insider information that there GM is a crackhead and will be throwing some white rocks his way. 3)Jerome James and Stephan Marbbury? C'mon man! 4)Phoenix trade us Amare Stoudimire and Steve Nash for Jason Kidd and Malik Allen...When this trade goes down I'll be having a menage a trois with Jessica Alba and Jessica Biel. 5)Not as bad as the others you take Josh Boone out of that proposal and as I'd do it...get rid of Collins and Allen, send Kidd to be with Kobe and Bring Odom, Turiaf, Farmar, J Crittenton. and Kwame
Best trade ever: http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/trad...p;te=&cash= Kidd James Jefferson Williams Howard
All those are laughable. Especially the one where the Hornets lose their two best big men, a shooter, and a young talented pg who is putting up great numbers.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MyNetsForLife @ Dec 24 2007, 04:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Best trade ever: http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/trad...p;te=&cash= Kidd James Jefferson Williams Howard</div> Hey, as long as we get Foyle, that trade looks good to me. DO IT THRON!
Some people are deceiving themselves to suit their own purposes of what Kidd's value actually is. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jloc857 @ Dec 24 2007, 03:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>everyone one of those trades is god awful 1) Boston is what 21-3? They don't trade anyone...plus Rajon Rondo is playing out of his mind at PG 2)New Orleans has a great young trio in CP3, West and Chandler...why trade for an aging PG unless you have insider information that there GM is a crackhead and will be throwing some white rocks his way. 3)Jerome James and Stephan Marbbury? C'mon man! 4)Phoenix trade us Amare Stoudimire and Steve Nash for Jason Kidd and Malik Allen...When this trade goes down I'll be having a menage a trois with Jessica Alba and Jessica Biel. 5)Not as bad as the others you take Josh Boone out of that proposal and as I'd do it...get rid of Collins and Allen, send Kidd to be with Kobe and Bring Odom, Turiaf, Farmar, J Crittenton. and Kwame</div> Jloc857. 1) Exactly, Boston has a good record, Kidd would want to play there. If Rajan Rondo is actually playing with an altered mindstate, he'll get caught soon enough and be out of the league. Boston would be wise to do this trade before its too late. 2) George Shin = cheapie, they get rid of their big long contracts, and get cash and a pick. 3) Only a 7 word response? Word on the street is that Marbury isn't as untouchable as he was a couple seasons ago. 4) If you named your right and left hands Jessica Alba and Jessica Biel, then I believe you. Enjoy your ménage à trois. 5) I agree, its a good trade. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kidd @ Dec 24 2007, 03:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Nash and Amare for Kidd and Malik. That one was without the best. And why would Boston trade away KG? Same goes with Paul?</div> To make their team better in the short and long term. How many times has KG or Paul led their team to the Finals?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Lavalamp @ Dec 24 2007, 06:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Some people are deceiving themselves to suit their own purposes of what Kidd's value actually is. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jloc857 @ Dec 24 2007, 03:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>everyone one of those trades is god awful 1) Boston is what 21-3? They don't trade anyone...plus Rajon Rondo is playing out of his mind at PG 2)New Orleans has a great young trio in CP3, West and Chandler...why trade for an aging PG unless you have insider information that there GM is a crackhead and will be throwing some white rocks his way. 3)Jerome James and Stephan Marbbury? C'mon man! 4)Phoenix trade us Amare Stoudimire and Steve Nash for Jason Kidd and Malik Allen...When this trade goes down I'll be having a menage a trois with Jessica Alba and Jessica Biel. 5)Not as bad as the others you take Josh Boone out of that proposal and as I'd do it...get rid of Collins and Allen, send Kidd to be with Kobe and Bring Odom, Turiaf, Farmar, J Crittenton. and Kwame</div> Jloc857. 1) Exactly, Boston has a good record, Kidd would want to play there. If Rajan Rondo is actually playing with an altered mindstate, he'll get caught soon enough and be out of the league. Boston would be wise to do this trade before its too late. 2) George Shin = cheapie, they get rid of their big long contracts, and get cash and a pick. 3) Only a 7 word response? Word on the street is that Marbury isn't as untouchable as he was a couple seasons ago. 4) If you named your right and left hands Jessica Alba and Jessica Biel, then I believe you. Enjoy your ménage à trois. 5) I agree, its a good trade. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kidd @ Dec 24 2007, 03:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Nash and Amare for Kidd and Malik. That one was without the best. And why would Boston trade away KG? Same goes with Paul?</div> To make their team better in the short and long term. How many times has KG or Paul led their team to the Finals? </div> 1)hahaha...... 2)hahahahahahhahahah.... 3)HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH. 4) <span style="color:#ff0000">Not Nice - peg</span> 5)Like I said before if you take Josh Boone out of that deal it is a great trade for us and almost realistic. How many times have Paul Pierce, Kevin Garnett and Ray Allen been on the same team? Answer is never...which happens to be the same answer to the same question of the likelyhood of any of your trades ever happening. Never... Hell Freezes over Pigs Fly Democrats and Republicans merge parties and Osama converts to Christianity pledging his love for the USA before any of those trades happen.
Wow, you were serious about those trades? Garnett would do more for the Celtics than Kidd could. Sean wouldn't help much, they're going for it now. The Hornets one is a joke. Paul will soon be the best PG in the league. Kidd will just be a gigantic expiring contract. Knicks, are you kidding? "Word on the street is that Marbury isn't as untouchable as he was a couple seasons ago." That wasn't his point. He's saying Starbury is a horrible player, and not wanted. And James is worse than Collins. Alright. So the Suns trade the best PG in the league, and one of the top big men, for Kidd and a scrub. I sense something wrong here. Laker's trade is okay, when it's: http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/trad...p;te=&cash=.
I'd love for Paul to be a Net...in a few years. Perhaps our Brooklyn pointguard if Marcus isn't with us then.
