I dot like it..its WAY WAY too hard too see at the buttom and text is hard too see too....nothing is in the sig..all there is render bg text..add some sines and stuff..
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (david @ Jan 13 2007, 01:13 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I dot like it..its WAY WAY too hard too see at the buttom and text is hard too see too....nothing is in the sig..all there is render bg text..add some sines and stuff..</div>Thanks for the comments and all but I don't see how it's hard to see at the bottom at all. I can see it clearly. The color is dark towards the bottom but it's still easily viewable. Also I have a light text in a darker area of the sig. Explain how it's hard to read? I can clearly read that also. There's over 40 layers all together in that sig so yes there is stuff un it. Also what else do you expect me to put other than a pic, bg, and text? I can add stuff in the bg like signs like you suggested but that stuff doesn't fit in this style of sig. Sorry, normally I take negative feedback gladly but your whole post didn't make much sense/
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (david @ Jan 13 2007, 04:13 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I dot like it..its WAY WAY too hard too see at the buttom and text is hard too see too....nothing is in the sig..all there is render bg text..add some sines and stuff..</div>Wow everything you said is wrong and your basing your judgement on what you like not whats good. Anyway great sig. Simple and very effective.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (david @ Jan 13 2007, 05:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>sure..</div>you kind of are lol. You even said in your last post 7/10 because you like light sigs and not dark sigs. If that's not basing it off what you like to do in sigs I don't know what is.
Not bad. I'm not to sure about the overall color of the sig and I think it is overcontrasted as far as brightness to darkness up and down.
