http://www.sportsgamer.com/madden_roster_list.phpCooley is a FB, WHY?!Lloyd's speed 88, Randle El's 94, Portis's 95?Every other rating is really good... better than ever IMO.Check out the new attributes for every position. Really tight!
I'm not believing anything 'til I see it from IGN.Actually... on 2nd thought... that site looks pretty legit to me :beerbang2:
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Capt. Comeback @ Aug 10 2006, 07:19 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Vasher a 90? I don't think that is right at all.</div>Vasher is really good wasnt he among the league leaders in INT?
the giants are beastly in that ratings...Arrington 90madison 90strhan 97Pierce 91Osi 91Barber 94manning 88burress 90shockey 97
Guess 145 total tackles isn't worth a rating in the 90s (see Pisa Tinoisamoa).Our draft picks in rounds 1-3 are all 80 (with the exception of Wroten). 4th rounder is 76. They don't even have our 5-7 picks.Holt's speed should probably be 95-96, not 93.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Punisher @ Aug 9 2006, 11:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>http://www.sportsgamer.com/madden_roster_list.phpCooley is a FB, WHY?!Lloyd's speed 88, Randle El's 94, Portis's 95?Every other rating is really good... better than ever IMO.Check out the new attributes for every position. Really tight!</div>Lloyd isnt fast... at all...Antonio Bryant 86
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brooksie5 @ Aug 10 2006, 02:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Guess 145 total tackles isn't worth a rating in the 90s (see Pisa Tinoisamoa).Our draft picks in rounds 1-3 are all 80 (with the exception of Wroten). 4th rounder is 76. They don't even have our 5-7 picks.Holt's speed should probably be 95-96, not 93.</div>Vernon Davis 86 OVR 92 SPD 92 ACC with the rest of the rook TEs in the division not even close, Im lovin it!
Psh. Klopfenstein and Byrd are 80. That's pretty close I guess.92 speed! DAMN. That's unstoppable for a TE. If they have fantasy draft for franchise mode on the 360, i'm getting him early!
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JHair @ Aug 10 2006, 03:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Vernon Davis, wow. Chris Cooley, WOWER.</div>He's not even a FB! He's a damn H-Back! What a damn travesty along with LT not bein 99!
Rookies are all too overrated. The previous years rookies suffer because of thatPretty happy though with the Ravens' ratings.Reed 99 Ray Ray 98, Suggs Pryce 92, McAlister 96 Rolle 91 Ngata 83 Gregg 84 Adalius 89 Scott 84 Landry 72 Cody only 75 thoughAverage of starters: 89 overall including Landry's bum ass with Cody 89.3, without either 90.8DOMINATING!!!!!!!!!!offense is good tooHeap 95 Ogden 96 McNair 88 Mason 90 Clayton 85 Mulitalo 90 Anderson 87 Flynn 86 Vincent 80 Terry/Pashos 70 Chester 75 Ricard whos not even on the team anymore 89 D. Williams 75 Sypnieski 75 Stover 89 I don't get how Clarence Moore is 77 while Darling is only 70. Darling is a lot better than Moore is. lolDon't have Sam Koch though... he nets 50+ yards in practice
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Bleed Green @ Aug 10 2006, 02:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Capt. Comeback @ Aug 10 2006, 07:19 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Vasher a 90? I don't think that is right at all.</div>Vasher is really good wasnt he among the league leaders in INT?</div>So INT's make you a good corner? Then why is Champ Bailey a 99 and Deltha O'Neal not a 95+?Vasher still should not be a 90, considering he only really played last year.
Some of the vikes ratings are really bad. Mewelde Moore worse than Ciatrick Fason? Weird.. Not too much to complain about otherwise though.
