"Maximizing Cap Space"

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by BrianFromWA, Apr 21, 2013.

  1. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hopefully this helps a bit: maybe instead of a thread it could be an article post, b/c this will probably be pretty long. But this way you can ask questions.

    1. Guaranted roster spots
    As the roster currently stands, there is $43.2M committed to the following 8 players:
    Aldridge: $14.6M
    Batum: $11.3M
    Matthews: $6.9M
    Lillard: $3.2M
    Freeland: $2.9M
    Leonard: $2.2M
    Claver: $1.3M
    Barton: $0.8M

    The non-guaranteed contract of Pavlovic is another $1.4M, unless he is released. I need to verify the "if-by" date but I'm assuming June 30 (Jeffries' was earlier this week, but most are June 30--see Blake and Webster--while a occasionally they're non-guaranteed if a player is released before Opening Night). I'm assuming he will either be traded or outright waived by June 30. To "maximize" space, he will simply be waived or traded for a 2nd-rounder (which doesn't have a cap number assigned). So running cap number is still at $43.2M.

    The likely (> 0.05%) draft picks are #1, #2, #3, #10, and #11. These carry a hold of between $1.8M (for the 11th pick) and $4.4M (for #1). Most likely (~87% chance) is the #10 pick, for a $1.9M hold. Running cap number is between $45.0M and $47.6M, most likely $45.1M.

    $490k hold for each unoccupied roster spot under 12. With the 8 guaranteed players and the draft pick, that leaves 3 holds at $490k apiece or $1.47M. Once someone is signed (or another hold is enforced, like a free agent hold for Hickson or Maynor) then that $490k hold goes away. "Maximizing space" would add $1.47M for the 3 cap holds. Running cap number is now between $46.5M and $49.1M, most likely $46.6M.

    2. Uncertain (Potential) free agent cap holds: Hickson's cap hold is $7.6M (190% of his salary this year--as a Bird below-average contract NOT following rookie contract) if the team chooses to keep his Bird rights. This would be useful if we plan on signing him over $7.6M a year. If we keep this cap hold, it takes the place of one of the $490k roster holds and add $7.1M to the cap number.

    Maynor's cap number is $5.85M (250% of his salary this year--as a below-average salary following 4th year of rookie contract). The Blazers must offer a qualifying offer to make him an RFA (which has been reported by Freeman to be $3.4M, but CBA states that it's 125% of his $2.34M contract, or $2.9M. He doesn't meet "starter criteria" for a higher QO). If he signs the QO, the $5.85M hold goes away and the $2.9M contract becomes the new cap number and one of the roster holds goes away.
    Olshey has stated that the QO situation with Maynor is "strategic" and many feel that it will not be offered.

    3. 2013-14 Salary Cap
    This year's salary cap number was $58.044M, a luxury tax line of $70.307M and the apron of $74.307M. For 2013-14, it will be 53.51% of BRI (minus benefits) divided among the 30 teams. As a rough calculation (NOT the official one) I use 1.21*(salary cap projection) to get my luxury tax projections. If the 60M salary cap projection is to be believed, then the tax line would be about 72.6M and the apron would be 76.6M. This year is the first year of the "incremental" tax rate, and 2014-15 will be the first year of the the "repeater rate" penalty.

    4. Other tidbits:
    Moratorium is July 1-July 9. First available time to sign is July 10 12:01. New free agents can be visited 12:01am EST July 1.

    The non-taxpayer MLE is $5.15M.
    The taxpayer MLE is $3.183M.
    The room exception (for teams that started out below the salary cap): $2.652M. Can only be a maximum of 2 years.
    The BAE (if you are below apron--$4M over tax-- and didn't use whichever MLE or room you qualified for) is $2.016M.
    The draft picks cap holds are as follows:
    1: $4.4M; 2: $4.0M; 3: $3.6M; 10: $1.9M; 11: $1.8M

    To receive a player in a S&T, you cannot end up above apron after your trade, and cannot have used MLE already.

    Cash available for trades $3.2M total for the year. You cannot buy a pick for $3.2M, sell a pick for $3.2M, and buy a new one for $3.2M.


    5. Conclusion:
    Haynes has reported cap space numbers of $11.8M and $13.1M, but the analysis above doesn't quite support that. Olshey has stated $11.6M.

    The most likely scenario (keeping the lotto pick, which ends up at #10, and renouncing Pavlovic, Hickson and Maynor) means a cap number (including roster holds) of $46.6M. You would subtract this number from whatever the new salary cap is to get your "cap space". My guess is that people have been using the $58.044M salary cap from 2011-12 and 2012-13 in their analyses, (because they aren't "projections"), when the cap is almost certainly going to be higher (perhaps, if you believe Stern's remarks from November, MUCH higher). Assuming this cap of $58.044M is applied next year as well, then the cap space in the most likely scenario is $11.4M. If the Blazers don't use their draft pick, then that moves to $12.7M (remember, if the pick is traded, that incurs a $490k "roster" hold instead of the $1.8M hold--so you're basically giving up a lotto pick for $1.3M in space).
    However, I think it highly unlikely that the cap doesn't go up to at least $60M, which would give the Blazers $13.4M in space in the "most likely" scenario and $14.7M if the team trades its pick for nothing.
     
    Last edited: Apr 22, 2013
    HailBlazers, Darkwebs, oldguy and 3 others like this.
  2. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,783
    Likes Received:
    27,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    1st question

    What is he rule about teams being under the cap unable to use one of the exceptions? Also something about being under, then going over to use it?
     
  3. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The Room Mid-Level Exception is what you're asking about, I think.

    So we can renounce all of our holds, etc and have, say, 13M in space. We can get 13M worth of players, then use the room exception go over the cap to sign another for ~2.5M. As well as any veteran minimum players.
     
  4. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,783
    Likes Received:
    27,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So the large exception can only be used by teams over the cap....right?
     
  5. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The biggest is for those below the apron but over the cap (for 2012-13, between 58M and 74M---probably b/w 60 and 76M this summer). It's called the non-taxpayer and starts at $5.15M, and is what you probably think of when you hear "MLE".
    The taxpayer MLE is $3.183M, for teams that are over the "apron"--or have a cap number above about 76M this summer.
    The room exception (for teams that started out below the salary cap) is $2.652M, and can be used after you fill up all your cap space.
     
  6. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    57,713
    Likes Received:
    56,216
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    Can't rep you apparently, but I really needed this. Thank you.
     
  7. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    57,713
    Likes Received:
    56,216
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    This needs to be stickied until after the FA period.

    Questions now. Assume this following scenario:

    1. We draft a player at #10.
    2. After the moratorium, we trade that draft pick + Joel (2.9) for McGee (10.7), and are left with a cap number of [(43.2 + (10.7 - 2.9 - 1.3)] = 53.1
    3. We use ~6mil of that space to sign a player outright without any exceptions and still stay slightly below the cap so that we can still S&T players

    Now can we trade Hickson and go above the cap but below the luxury tax level or the apron? Also, I'm guessing we would lose the ability to use the room exceptions now as we are over the cap, but how else can we fill the remaining two spots?
     
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2013
  8. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,041
    Likes Received:
    57,186
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Isn't 14 million the most you can offer someone without bird rights?
     
  9. Shooter

    Shooter Unanimously Great

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2008
    Messages:
    5,484
    Likes Received:
    152
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    advertising
    Location:
    Blazerville
    Good work, Brian. Must have taken you hours to compose your original post.
     
  10. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No. If you have the space it's limited to the "maximum contract" available to a player, which is based almost entirely on time in the league, with a couple of exceptions. The max salary in the NBA is also based as a % of the salary cap, subject to a fixed maximum.
    What does that mean?

    For someone with 0-6 years of service, you can only offer 25% of the salary cap, which last year was about $14.5M, AND has to be below the league fixed amount for your time in service unless it's 105% of your last year's salary. Hibbert's contract last year actually only starts at the max of $13.67M, which was a "max" for a player with 4 years in the league.
    For someone with 7-10 years it's 30%, or $16.4M, whichever is lower, unless you made 16M or more the year before, in which case you can get 105% of your last salary.
    For someone with 10+ years, it's 35%, or 19.1M, whichever is lower, unless you made around 18-19M or more the year before, in which case you can get 105% of your last salary. Which is why K*be, even though his "max" is 19.1M per the CBA, can have a contract paying him 30.4M next year.

    So technically, we could offer Dwight Howard a contract starting at 20.4M a year if we had about 7M going back to the L*kers in trade, even though 16.4M is the "max" for a 9-year player.

    Also, Bird rights don't matter in setting a starting salary, but if you have them your raises can be 7.5% instead of 4.5%.
     
  11. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Here's the problem as I see it in your scenario. If you want to S&T Hickson (if I'm reading the CBA right), you either must have the cap hold taking up that 7.6M in space (which you don't in your scenario) or you have to use cap space to sign him in order to trade him. In your scenario, you've already used up almost all of your space, so after spending 59 of the 60 million you can't sign JJ to, say, an 8M starting salary and trade him to somewhere.

    But let's say that we traded the pick, Joel, and Claver for McGee. Now we are at a cap number of 51.8M, and have 8.2M in space. We can then "un-renounce" JJ for the 7.6M hold (leaving us 600k in space), give him a contract starting at 10M, and trade him for a player/players making 12.6M (125%+100k), as long as the receiving team doesn't go over the apron (which I assumed at around 76M). We then have Lillard/Wes/Batum/LMA/McGee/12.6M player and still can use the room exception of 2yrs/5.4M or so.
     
  12. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,041
    Likes Received:
    57,186
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Okay, the difference between bird rights and non-bird rights is about 3% raise?
     
  13. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    The 3% is significant over the term of the contract.

    Brilliant work Brian!
     
  14. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,041
    Likes Received:
    57,186
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Well ya. And doesn't bird rights entail an extra year on the contract as well?
     
  15. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,687
    Likes Received:
    13,094
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So Brian, am assuming then that though you can S&T a player you have renounced the rights to, you still need to have the space to sign him to that contract, since renouncing him essentially removes your bird rights to him, right?
     
  16. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,041
    Likes Received:
    57,186
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    I think he addressed this a while back. Renouncing removes bird rights.

    My question would be, can you sign and trade a player that you don't have bird rights with?
     
  17. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    As I see it, yes. Kind of like last year when we renounced JJ's rights, then just signed him like a normal UFA. In this case, we would sign him like a normal UFA and then trade him.
     
  18. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,041
    Likes Received:
    57,186
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    There aren't any rules about that? I don't think I've ever seen a team with cap space sign a free agent and trade them, unless they already had their bird rights.
     
  19. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yep, Coon #89 deals with that specifically:
     
  20. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    the issue with Bird Rights in this case, Nate, is that the starting salary would have to fit under your cap if you don't have them. So no one can sign-and-trade JJ from under us (the re-sign has to be with the current team) and we either have to have his cap hold in order to make him an offer that would go over our cap (which we'd be allowed to do) or have the space to sign him outright if he's renounced.
     

Share This Page