NFL's Most Disappointing Teams

Discussion in 'NFL General' started by Pack Attack, Sep 7, 2005.

  1. Pack Attack

    Pack Attack The KISS Army

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Messages:
    4,726
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
  2. panthersare#1

    panthersare#1 The GM

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2005
    Messages:
    3,669
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    the raiders were such a disapoitment 2 years ago. They go from 2nd best to second worst in one year
     
  3. Pack Attack

    Pack Attack The KISS Army

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Messages:
    4,726
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    I'm surprised that the 15-1 Vikings team that made the NFC Championship Game and fell to the Falcons isn't on the list...
     
  4. DP

    DP He shoots, he scores!

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2005
    Messages:
    7,810
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Wow some bad teams.
     
  5. MKIV_Supra

    MKIV_Supra 2006 NFL-*****s FF Grand Champion

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2005
    Messages:
    2,553
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    San Diego, California
    86 Bears?
     
  6. Pack Attack

    Pack Attack The KISS Army

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Messages:
    4,726
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>86 Bears?</div>

    They're actually listed as one of the teams. As BF1 is sure to point out, though, it's only because of a dirty play by the Packers that they didn't go to the Superbowl (and probably win it) that year.

    It says that it's hard to call a 15-2 team a "disappointment," but they really should have won it all in '86. The cheap shot by Charles Martin really was unfortunate. A true black eye for the sport...

    (I can already hear BF1 now..."A black eye, just like Favre's "deal" with Strahan."

    Blah, blah, blah...
     
  7. Thoth

    Thoth Sisyphus in training

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2003
    Messages:
    7,218
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    the 801
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Pack Attack)</div><div class='quotemain'>it's only because of a dirty play by the Packers that they didn't go to the Superbowl (and probably win it) that year.</div>

    That a$$ whoopin by Marino and Co on monday night was completely inconsequential.
     
  8. Pack Attack

    Pack Attack The KISS Army

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Messages:
    4,726
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>That a$$ whoopin by Marino and Co on monday night was completely inconsequential.</div>

    That was in 85... We're talking about the 86 Bears who had to play without McMahon at the end of the season.
     
  9. Bearsfan1

    Bearsfan1 2 Time Defending FF Champion

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2003
    Messages:
    6,450
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Pack Attack)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>86 Bears?</div>

    They're actually listed as one of the teams. As BF1 is sure to point out, though, it's only because of a dirty play by the Packers that they didn't go to the Superbowl (and probably win it) that year.

    It says that it's hard to call a 15-2 team a "disappointment," but they really should have won it all in '86. The cheap shot by Charles Martin really was unfortunate. A true black eye for the sport...

    (I can already hear BF1 now..."A black eye, just like Favre's "deal" with Strahan."

    Blah, blah, blah...</div>

    Since you called martin out, as the scumbag loser he is, i will not bring farve into it
     

Share This Page