Obama to 'refine' Iraq plan after visiting Baghdad

Discussion in 'Off-Topic' started by Real, Jul 3, 2008.

  1. Real

    Real Dumb and Dumbest

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2007
    Messages:
    2,858
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Obama to 'refine' Iraq plan
    By: Mike Allen
    July 3, 2008 05:55 PM EST

    Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) on Thursday backed off his firm promise to withdraw combat forces from Iraq immediately and instead said he could “refine” his plan after his trip to Baghdad later this month.

    Earlier, a top Obama adviser had said that the senator is not “wedded” to a specific timeline.

    Obama told reporters in Fargo, N.D., that he is “going to do a thorough assessment."

    "When I go to Iraq and I have a chance to talk to some of the commanders on the ground, I'm sure I'll have more information and will continue to refine my policies," he said, according to CBS News. “I have been consistent, throughout this process, that I believe the war in Iraq was a mistake.”

    Obama later said at a second news conference he still intends to stick to the timeline.

    The original Obama plan, still on his website, promises: “Obama will immediately begin to remove our troops from Iraq. He will remove one to two combat brigades each month and have all of our combat brigades out of Iraq within 16 months.”

    In a separate six-page Iraq plan, he says in a section headed “All Combat Troops Redeployed by 2009”: “The best way to protect our security and to pressure Iraq's leaders to resolve their civil war is to begin immediately to remove our combat troops. Not in six months or one year — now.”

    David Axelrod, Obama’s chief strategist, began backing off during remarks Wednesday on CNN’s “Situation Room,” telling guest host John Roberts that Obama has actually advocated “a phased withdrawal, with benchmarks for the Iraqi government to meet, that called for strategic pauses, based on the progress on these benchmarks and advice on the commanders on the ground.”

    “He's always said that he would listen to the advice of commanders on the ground, that that would factor into his thinking,” Axelrod said. “He's also always said that we had to be as careful getting out of Iraq as we were careless getting in. So he's been very consistent on this point. ...

    “I think he will take the advice, not just the advice of the commanders on the ground but his general assessment of conditions on the ground in calibrating that withdrawal. He said he thought we could get one to two brigades out a month. But he's not wedded to that in the face of events. No president would be. And he's always said that he's never said that this withdrawal would be without any possibility of alteration based on events on the ground. That would not be a prudent thing to do for any president.”

    The Republican National Committee plans to make an issue of the evolving statements and has posted “Obama’s Iraq Guessing Game,” rounding up various statements on Iraq by the senator, his aides and surrogates.</div>

    Link

    I wonder if Democrats are going to think twice about Obama getting the nomination if he does alter his position on ending the Iraq war. Considering his whole campaign is about "change," if he decides change is not in order, he might be giving John McCain an easier time to make up ground in the polls.
     
  2. huevonkiller

    huevonkiller Change (Deftones)

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Messages:
    25,798
    Likes Received:
    90
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    Student.
    Location:
    Miami, Florida
    I think he needs to listen to the military leaders on the ground. The situation in Iraq wasn't always this positive. Regardless, his larger message of avoiding this quagmire in the first place is what people care about.
     
  3. Hunter

    Hunter Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2003
    Messages:
    9,560
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    What is funny to me is to see his shift of being adamantly against the war (bring home troops immediately) during the primary contest to actually leaning more towards the middle and realizing that Iraq is working and that an immediate withdrawl will not do anyone any good, especially the United States.

    With having 15 of the 17 benchmarks coming back as satisfactory, he is having to re-think his position.
     

Share This Page