Our backcourt

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Natebishop3, Jun 28, 2013.

  1. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,054
    Likes Received:
    57,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    So drafting CJ opens up some questions about where our backcourt is heading next season.

    Outside of Lillard, what will our depth chart look like at the start of the 2013-2014 season?

    Will we keep Maynor? Will we trade Matthews? Will we go after someone like Tyreke Evans? is Barton the backup shooting guard?

    Right now the depth chart looks something like this:

    Lillard/McCollum/Maynor?
    Matthews/Barton/Crabbe?
     
  2. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No we won't tender Maynor an offer, we shouldn't commit cap space to him yet to be the 3rd PG when we don't have a starting center.

    I think we are fine in the backcourt, we can add a vet minimum guard at the end of free agency. A third PG who can defend and in a pinch run the offense. Batum and Clavier are the only SF, but Wes and Barton can play extended minutes there so the wing spots look fine. I'm really concerned about a defensive big I think that should be our #1 and #2 free agent signings.
     
    Nate4Prez likes this.
  3. NOVoodoo

    NOVoodoo Kickin it in 2525

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2012
    Messages:
    2,057
    Likes Received:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Tennessee
    The way I understood the pick, shouldn't it work something like -

    PG - Lillard/McCollum
    SG - Matthews/McCollum

    I thought that the McCollum pick wasn't so much of a back-up position behind Lillard or Matthews but rather a versatile pick that can play alongside either Lillard or Matthews, when a backcourt starter's getting some rest. I figured Lillard/McCollum/Matthews would really split the 96 minutes at both guard spots pretty evenly.

    Am I wrong in that assessment?
     
  4. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,054
    Likes Received:
    57,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    I'm sure Barton will fit somewhere in there as well.
     
  5. TowelBoy

    TowelBoy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    300
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Occupation:
    Attorney
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    I think we will make a play for Evans. McLemore's draft slide was fortuitous for the Kings franchise as well as ours.

    Also, the Rockets will successfully land Dwight Howard and we will trade for Asik using Matthews and Freeland (or Matthews and Leonard if push comes to shove).

    Now, back to discussing the back court more specifically, I think Maynor is gone for sure. I think Crabbe catches on as the 4th guard and a defense-threes-athleticism specialist. He's flat-out better than Barton, who will be buried deep on the bench.

    I could see us taking another flier on Elliott Williams since it should be dirt cheap and, frustratingly, we still haven't really seen what he can do.
     
  6. TowelBoy

    TowelBoy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    300
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Occupation:
    Attorney
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    I admit Barton showed a few flashes last year, but I still haven't seen enough to think he's a rotation player on a team with anything but a historically laughable bench, which we had. He's not a pure shooter and McCollum was drafted to be a way, way better version of the "offensive spark" role.
     
  7. Rastapopoulos

    Rastapopoulos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    41,872
    Likes Received:
    26,204
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Ballin'
    Lang Greene @LangGreene 58 minutes ago
    Portland won't issue Eric Maynor a qualifying offer making the guard an unrestricted free agent this summer according to my man @Ben Golliver



    We have too many SGs and no backup PG. I can't help but think there's a trade planned.
     
  8. BLAZER PROPHET

    BLAZER PROPHET Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    18,725
    Likes Received:
    191
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    dental malpractice claims adjuster
    Location:
    Portland area
    We now have some ability to maintain quality guard play for 48 minutes with some good shooters and ball handlers. How miutes shake out isn't important.
     
  9. Sinobas

    Sinobas Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    14,608
    Likes Received:
    5,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I hope the Blazers keep Maynor, we need another competant ball handler. CJ McCollum looks like a TO machine, better suited to be a SG.
     
  10. TowelBoy

    TowelBoy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    300
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Occupation:
    Attorney
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Maynor would have to sign up for a very limited role here behind Lillard, McCollum, and Matthews in the pecking order. Given his size and P&R game, it seems like McCollum is more than adequate for the 10-12 minutes Lillard sits.
     
  11. B-Roy

    B-Roy If it takes months

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    31,701
    Likes Received:
    24,927
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I sure hope not.
     
  12. Reep

    Reep Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,545
    Likes Received:
    3,569
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    South Jordan, UT
    Olshey said that they had decided not to keep Maynor before the draft. I don't think they want him back under any circumstances.
     
  13. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Trade Wes. You have Crabbe to play the big guard role.
     
  14. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    57,713
    Likes Received:
    56,216
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    Absolutely agree. I hated his game. Reminds me of an inefficient Outlaw who can't shoot. Didn't see any flashes from him to lead me to think he'll be any more than a 10th man. I like Crabbe better.
     
  15. OregonHuskerMan

    OregonHuskerMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    1,388
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    West Linn
    I think it is

    Lillard l McCollum
    Wes l McCollum l Crabbe

    I do not particularly see how we can land Tyreke with our given situation, with us needing to focus on C.
     
  16. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    I think we use Matthews and Leonard for a center. We will still have significant cap space to get Evans and even another role player.
     
  17. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    After a decent start in PDX, Maynor was a non-factor for much of his stint.

    10.6 PER
    18.6 USG
    20.7 TO%
    100 Ortg
    114 Drtg
    .016 WS/48

    I have to think that McCollum at the very least can give the Blazers next to nothing, which is what Maynor ended up doing for the team.
     
  18. OregonHuskerMan

    OregonHuskerMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    1,388
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    West Linn
    I guess I don't see what center we can bring back with those 2 pieces that matters.

    I will probably kill myself if we go for Gortat.

    Asik and Matt Barnes is pretty much my ideal off season at this point.

    or Pek and Matt Barnes or Mike Dunleavy Jr, I suppose.
     
  19. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    If Houston gets Howard; I think Matthews and Leonard would be enough to get asik, IMO.
     
  20. OregonHuskerMan

    OregonHuskerMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    1,388
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    West Linn
    Doesn't Wes make more than Asik...?
     

Share This Page