I haven't seen your other stuff, so I donno if this is your best or not.The sig 2 me looks plain. The text needs help, there is no real focal point on there, and in turn no real lighting. The lighting is on the far left, so the eye is attracted there, but thats where the sig ends, and there is no more lighting on the main render. The bg is basic as well. You could also sharpen the main render up a bit.I'm not trying to come off as a douchebag or anything, just giving some helpful critiques
Seriously, you guys don't need to say it's your best for every single sig you make. It should be better each time.And I'm not just saying it to you AUT
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (l?ckdown @ Jun 14 2007, 07:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I haven't seen your other stuff, so I donno if this is your best or not.The sig 2 me looks plain. The text needs help, there is no real focal point on there, and in turn no real lighting. The lighting is on the far left, so the eye is attracted there, but thats where the sig ends, and there is no more lighting on the main render. The bg is basic as well. You could also sharpen the main render up a bit.I'm not trying to come off as a douchebag or anything, just giving some helpful critiques</div>Yeah dude, I don't mind the critiques. That is what I'm really looking for to get a lot better. Since your new, you wouldn't know but I'm pretty new to Photoshop, so yeah that why it doesn't look so great.This is my first siggy I've said it's my best, but it really is.
