Re: PFF's Mock V2 1) Portland - Greg Oden2) Seattle - Kevin Durant3) Atlanta - Brandan Wright4) Memphis - Al Horford5) Boston - Yi Janilin6) Milwauke - Corey Brewer7) Minnesota - Mike Conley Jr.8) Charlotte - Joakim Noah9) Chicago - Spencer Hawes10) Sacremento - Al Thornton11) Atlanta - Javaris Critteton12) Philadelphia - Jeff Green13) NO/Oklahoma City - Nick Young14) L.A. Clippers - Acie Law IV15) Detroit - Thaedus Young16) Washington - Jason Smith17) New Jersey - Tiago Splitter18) Golden State - Marcus Williams19) L.A. Lakers - Josh McRoberts20) Miami - Rodney Stuckey21) Philadelphia - Sean Williams22) Charlotte - Ante Tomic23) New York - Gabe Pruitt24) Phoenix - Daequan Cook25) Utah - Marco Belinelli26) Houston - Glen Davis27) Detroit - Derrik Byars28) San Antonio - Alondo Tucker29) Phoenix - Rudy Fernandez30) Philadelphia - Aaron Gray
Re: PFF's Mock V2 <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (CelticFan @ Jun 15 2007, 09:45 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>not bad, but you missed Julian Wright.</div>:HAHAHA:I don't think Golden State is gonna take another wing player. They need a sorta mobile big man. And NO WAY IN HELL Crittenton goes over Law. Do you watch college ball? Law was an all-american and is a Chauncey Billups type of player. He could potentially start for the Hawks. Nobody is really sure about Crittenton who will probably be a bench player and take a while to develop. Don't get me wrong Crittenton is a hell of a talent but he is no Acie Law IV.
Re: PFF's Mock V2 -Jeff Green is not going past 10-IMO Milwaukee would take Conley if he was on the board-Crittenton over Law is just wrong, but we've seen wierder things happen-As of now, New Orleans would take Thaddeus over Nick Young, but that might change on the 25th-Ante Tomic pulled out a week or so ago-As much as I love him, Big Baby ain't going in the first round
Re: PFF's Mock V2 Our first 9 are the exact same now, but Acie Law will go before Crittenton (don't listen to NBAdraft.net)
Re: PFF's Mock V2 I've read on sites not named nbadraft.net that Crittenton has moved ahead of Law in some scouts opinion.so it could happen, if they think he's more of a true PG.
Re: PFF's Mock V2 <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (playaofthegame @ Jun 15 2007, 10:16 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>And NO WAY IN HELL Crittenton goes over Law.</div> It's actually a possibility. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if Crittenton was the second point guard taken. I would take Law over him, but Crittenton is a very intriguing prospect and I wouldn't be all that surprised if he goes 11 to Atlanta or 14 to LA. Decent mock PFF. Like CelticFan said, you forgot about Julian Wright lol. I agree with your top 9, except I'd switch Brewer and Conley. Also, like noballer said, Jeff Green is a lock to be a top 10 pick. Noballer, how would you know New Orleans would take Thaddeus over Nick?
Re: PFF's Mock V2 <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (CelticBalla32 @ Jun 15 2007, 10:39 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Noballer, how would you know New Orleans would take Thaddeus over Nick?</div><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (noballer07 @ Jun 15 2007, 09:34 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>-As of now, New Orleans would take Thaddeus over Nick Young, but that might change on the 25th</div>They haven't even worked out Nick yet, but they will on the 25th. They are loving Thaddeus so much that it appears that he might be their pick, SG need or not. Nick Young will have to show Scott that he is the guy they want and that he is committed.
Re: PFF's Mock V2 <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (noballer07 @ Jun 15 2007, 12:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>They haven't even worked out Nick yet, but they will on the 25th. They are loving Thaddeus so much that it appears that he might be their pick, SG need or not. Nick Young will have to show Scott that he is the guy they want and that he is committed.</div> Why did you re-quote yourself? I know what you said, I was asking why you said it. And all you know is that Coach Scott liked Thaddeus in one individual workout, that really doesn't mean anything, especially this early.
Re: PFF's Mock V2 As it stands right now, Thad is on the top of their board. Nick Young, even though he would be better for them, isn't up there right now, but might be after the workout. We don't know until then. This is why early mocks are so hard to do and are imprecise.
Re: PFF's Mock V2 <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (noballer07 @ Jun 15 2007, 12:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>As it stands right now, Thad is on the top of their board. Nick Young, even though he would be better for them, isn't up there right now, but might be after the workout. We don't know until then. This is why early mocks are so hard to do and are imprecise.</div> But you can't sit here and say that they value him more than Nick Young, just because Thaddeus worked out with them once. The workout period just started, obviously they haven't gotten a chance to bring everyone in. Even then, these individual workouts don't mean as much as a lot of people think. They know what they have in Thaddeus and Nick, they don't need to see them dribble around chairs and dunk the ball. The point is that you have no idea what they think about these players. Thaddeus may have been the most impressive thus far in the workout process, but that doesn't mean that they value him more than Nick Young.
Re: PFF's Mock V2 If we don't know what they really feel, then why even make a mock?? We do it off of what we get from draft sites and reports of the reactions of teams about workouts. It's true that I don't know how they really feel (hell, they might be more impressed by Nick's tapes than by Thad's workout), but I'm just going by how it stands right now and what I have heard, that's all.
Re: PFF's Mock V2 <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (noballer07 @ Jun 15 2007, 12:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>but I'm just going by how it stands right now and what I have heard, that's all.</div>of course MOST GM's lie about who they like and most mock drafts end up looking foolish.yet we all enjoy doing them we are silly creatures for sure
Re: PFF's Mock V2 <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (noballer07 @ Jun 15 2007, 09:34 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>-Jeff Green is not going past 10-IMO Milwaukee would take Conley if he was on the board-Crittenton over Law is just wrong, but we've seen wierder things happen-As of now, New Orleans would take Thaddeus over Nick Young, but that might change on the 25th-Ante Tomic pulled out a week or so ago-As much as I love him, Big Baby ain't going in the first round</div> - How do you know. - How do you know. - Their have been rumors. - How do you know. - Yup, he did. - He could.
Re: PFF's Mock V2 <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BrewCityBuck @ Jun 15 2007, 05:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>- How do you know. - How do you know. - Their have been rumors. - How do you know. - Yup, he did. - He could.</div>Did I say that I knew for sure? I'm only speculating like everybody else; I'm sorry if it came across a different way to you
Re: PFF's Mock V2 <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (noballer07 @ Jun 15 2007, 05:28 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Did I say that I knew for sure? I'm only speculating like everybody else; I'm sorry if it came across a different way to you </div> Usually in the past when I've dissagreed with someones pick, I've explained why.
Re: PFF's Mock V2 Haha, whoopsy, can't believe I forgot Julian WrightJavaris Critteton has surpased Acie Law according to lots of sources
Re: PFF's Mock V2 <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Go Warriors @ Jun 16 2007, 10:40 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Warriors are choosing Josh McRoberts</div>that would suck. I really hope we take Jason Smith.
