Prince/Maxiell in a sign and trade for Hedo?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Idog1976, Jul 1, 2009.

  1. Idog1976

    Idog1976 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Messages:
    6,709
    Likes Received:
    3,915
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    I look to the stars.
    Location:
    P-Town baby!
    Now that Detroit is getting Charlie V. this could mean Maxiell is available. They supposedly wanted Hedo which means Prince is on the block.

    We all know New Jersey is looking to get under the cap for 2010 and have cheap talent.


    (Please note in the following trade Orlando is used as Hedo is currently listed as their player.)

    This trade could satisfy all three teams needs. It would leave us thin at center but leave us with this lineup:

    PG - Harris/Dooling/Mills
    SG - Roy/CDR
    SF - Prince/Batum/Claver
    PF - LMA/Maxiell/Cunningham
    C - Oden/LMA/Pendergraph


    That starting lineup is the best in the league. Your depth is gone but your starting 5 is the best in the league and a defensive nightmare. Your bench has two defensive menaces in Batum and Maxiell. You consolidate your lineup to about 7 or 8 guys in the playoffs.

    New Jersey saves an additional 8 million or keeps cheap young talent (Bayless, Fernandez). They would be roughly 18 million under the cap next year.

    Thoughts? god I hope Dooling didn't go with VC. Hard to estimate the cap with VC still on the Nets.
     
  2. free_lafrentz

    free_lafrentz Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2009
    Messages:
    474
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Occupation:
    student
    Location:
    Eugene
    You could accomplish getting Devin Harris with FAR less bodies.
     
  3. Idog1976

    Idog1976 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Messages:
    6,709
    Likes Received:
    3,915
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    I look to the stars.
    Location:
    P-Town baby!
    I want Prince and Maxiell as well.
     
  4. Haakzilla

    Haakzilla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    9,402
    Likes Received:
    7,387
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    SEOWebDesignLLC.com
    Location:
    Central Oregon
    .../\...
    ...[]...
    ...[]...
    ...[]...
    :smokeone:
     
  5. free_lafrentz

    free_lafrentz Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2009
    Messages:
    474
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Occupation:
    student
    Location:
    Eugene
    We're trading away 5 rotation players, 2 of which are our best 2 Point Guards.

    I like the effort, but it's just too much stuff. You're trading away half of our team that plays regular minutes.
     
  6. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,684
    Likes Received:
    2,779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
  7. Tyler_Hansbrough

    Tyler_Hansbrough Auto-tune the News!

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2009
    Messages:
    593
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Owned. Although I do like that trade lol
     
  8. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't believe that trade is allowed by the CBA.

    Also Orlando would have to get some sort of compensation, at least future draft picks.

    And I don't see New Jersey trading Harris. Cap space doesn't do them any good if they trade away everybody, that'd basically make them an expansion team. Good free agents want a chance to win.
     
  9. Idog1976

    Idog1976 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Messages:
    6,709
    Likes Received:
    3,915
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    I look to the stars.
    Location:
    P-Town baby!
    Gets Harris as well and seemed more likely with Charlie V. and Gordon being signed. Sorry.

    Edit:

    Also someone in another thread said you can do an S and T if the player knows and agrees to it.
     
    Last edited: Jul 1, 2009
  10. Idog1976

    Idog1976 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Messages:
    6,709
    Likes Received:
    3,915
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    I look to the stars.
    Location:
    P-Town baby!
    Orlando is in because Hedo is, according to the obviously out of date ESPN trade machine, still a member of Orlando. This assumes a sign and trade.

    P.S. Your avatar rocks.
     
  11. Blue Magic

    Blue Magic New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2008
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Why wouldnt Hedo just let Orlando S&T him to Detroit? Why would he sign with Portland, just so that he could be immediately traded....
     
  12. Idog1976

    Idog1976 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Messages:
    6,709
    Likes Received:
    3,915
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    I look to the stars.
    Location:
    P-Town baby!
    Because Orlando can't sign him to as large of a contract as Portland can offer him. He wants the contract the team, if competitive, probably doesn't matter to him as much as the $.
     
  13. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Orlando can sign him for as much as they like since he's their former player and have bird rights, they aren't restrained by the cap in a way shape or form, conversely, Detroit has the cap room to absorb a larger contract than the amount of payroll they send out so in short, if Detroit wanted to do a sign and trade they could do it without including us -- and wouldn't.
     
  14. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,684
    Likes Received:
    2,779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    I would love to see the source of how this is possible... I think that someone said it originated from Mike Barrett's blog, but since the salary cap FAQ seems very specific in saying it CANNOT happen, and since there hasn't been a single instance of this happening under the current CBA, I would bet a dollar to a donut it's not legal.

    Ed O.
     

Share This Page