<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">Denver Post: "Nuggets assistant general manager David Fredman said Thursday that before Cleveland traded Ricky Davis to Boston, the Nuggets had been in talks about a potential three- or four-team deal that could have involved Davis. However, he said, Davis would not have come to Denver based on that hypothetical trade."</div> Full Article: http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,3...1840087,00.html
I wonder who the teams are involved in the deal and i wonder if they could get a better deal then what the cavs got?
Anyone would have gotten better, I didn't really like the Cavs trade. Cavs didn't gain what Ricky Davis had... they could have gotten much more for Ricky Davis than what they have now.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting MVPlaya:</div><div class="quote_post">Anyone would have gotten better, I didn't really like the Cavs trade. Cavs didn't gain what Ricky Davis had... they could have gotten much more for Ricky Davis than what they have now.</div> Very doubtful.The best they could of got not counting the Boston deal was..Caron Butler for Ricky Davis.Which would of been terrible for the Cavs..as Caron is not doing anything this season nor does he fill their needs. Cavs got a GREAT deal in my opinion.They not only got two very experience players in Battie and Williams but a guy with tons of potenial in Kedrick Brown.A good slasher while being an amazing dunker.People don't realise how good Eric Williams is.He is the prefect role player to have on your team. Question is would the Cavs of won their last two games without the trio of Williams,Battie and Brown..but with Davis I say NO
even though traded ricky they got a big man(tony battie) and some room for lebron to shine considering ricky was averaging around 15 points in cleveland