Saban's backfield plans vs Tampa

Discussion in 'AFC East' started by Thoth, Oct 12, 2005.

  1. Thoth

    Thoth Sisyphus in training

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2003
    Messages:
    7,218
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    the 801
    Nick said that both would start so deal with it.

    Why is it the media insists that Ricky is on the trading block? On cold pizza (ESPN2) this morning, the host asked if Ricky was being traded. Jason Cole of one of the Miami papers said probably not. The host rephrases and asks the SAME question AGAIN. You could see the exasperation in Cole's eyes as he had to reiteritate his original answer.
     
  2. MKIV_Supra

    MKIV_Supra 2006 NFL-*****s FF Grand Champion

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2005
    Messages:
    2,553
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    San Diego, California
    I heard that they may go into I-forum and switch each of them around so that one may block for the other back and forth. I think that is super stupid because they are not fullbacks and wouldn't like to block for anyone else. And if they put shotgun or singleback that one would act as a wideout. But splitting carries will keep the running game fresh but the fantasy numbers will drop.
     
  3. panthersare#1

    panthersare#1 The GM

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2005
    Messages:
    3,669
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    They should have like a full house backfield. Because then you could have both backs and a full back. That would be a scary backfield.

    The only reason i dont think they could do a split back formation is that the line isnt that good, and they need a lead blocker
     
  4. Bearsfan1

    Bearsfan1 2 Time Defending FF Champion

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2003
    Messages:
    6,450
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MKIV_Supra)</div><div class='quotemain'>I heard that they may go into I-forum and switch each of them around so that one may block for the other back and forth. I think that is super stupid because they are not fullbacks and wouldn't like to block for anyone else. And if they put shotgun or singleback that one would act as a wideout. But splitting carries will keep the running game fresh but the fantasy numbers will drop.</div>

    I am sure saban couldnt care less about fantasy numbers
     
  5. Thoth

    Thoth Sisyphus in training

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2003
    Messages:
    7,218
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    the 801
    "We are going to start both guys, so you can't ask me which one is starting," Saban said with a smile. "I might change my mind between now and then, but I am just telling you that we are starting both. One might play center and one might play tight end or wideout, but we are starting them both."
     
  6. MKIV_Supra

    MKIV_Supra 2006 NFL-*****s FF Grand Champion

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2005
    Messages:
    2,553
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    San Diego, California
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (blackadder)</div><div class='quotemain'>One might play center and one might play tight end or wideout, but we are starting them both."</div>

    Center and Tight End? Good luck with that.
     
  7. Wannab Favre

    Wannab Favre nfl-*****s member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    596
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    I think he was illustrating the fact that regardless of where they start, Saban is pretty adament they will start!

    I dont think either is a good enough blocker to be a lead blocker. I'd strt both of them and on the first play, have McMichael take off up the field, 76 yard TD pass!!
     

Share This Page