Should the Military Be Allowed to Detain Americans Indefinitely?

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by bluefrog, Nov 30, 2011.

  1. bluefrog

    bluefrog Go Blazers, GO!

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    1,964
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    Programmer
    Location:
    New Bern
    The Senate passed the National Defense Authorization Act today. The bill has gotten attention for the worldwide indefinite detention without charge or trial provision.

    LINK

     
  2. GriLtCheeZ

    GriLtCheeZ "Well, I'm not lookin' for trouble."

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,488
    Likes Received:
    2,923
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Gleaming the Cubicle
    Location:
    Portland, Oregon
    The terrorists are winning.
     
  3. THE HCP

    THE HCP NorthEastPortland'sFinest

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    71,303
    Likes Received:
    59,968
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    N.E.P.
    As an ex-Military Policeman I say YES!
     
  4. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Rand Paul tried to fight it, but failed.

    My view is that if someone fires at our troops and are captured, they can be held like POWs - until the war ends. If we swoop in and arrest someone who we claim is a terrorist, they deserve a trial - even if captured on foreign soil. If anyone is arrested here in the USA, they get miranda rights and the whole works.

    One of these days they'll declare all hispanics as terrorists and throw them in jail without any rights. And as a hispanic causin' panic, they'll come for HCP first.
     
  5. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,701
    Likes Received:
    2,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    The worst-case scenario for the application of that law seems to be that American citizens could be seized on American soil and then the PotUS would refrain from keeping them out of military process. Not a good outcome, and it seems like one that would be an unconstitutional exercise of power.

    I have no problems denying non-citizens all of the rights that citizens are afforded by the Constitution, personally, whether they are in the US or not.

    Ed O.
     
  6. Haakzilla

    Haakzilla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    9,457
    Likes Received:
    7,471
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    SEOWebDesignLLC.com
    Location:
    Central Oregon
    [video=youtube;QJAMXXbiskY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJAMXXbiskY[/video]
     
  7. huevonkiller

    huevonkiller Change (Deftones)

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Messages:
    25,798
    Likes Received:
    90
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    Student.
    Location:
    Miami, Florida
    Thank God for Rand Paul.

    Fuck John McCain and he needs to read the Constitution. What a coward.
     
  8. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,324
    Likes Received:
    43,686
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This feels like the same thought process that led to the Japanese internment camps during WWII. It was wrong then, and it's wrong now.
     
  9. HailBlazers

    HailBlazers RipCity

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    19,984
    Likes Received:
    17,204
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PDX
    Pretty F'ed up road were on here
     
  10. DaLincolnJones

    DaLincolnJones Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2011
    Messages:
    8,319
    Likes Received:
    1,886
    Trophy Points:
    113
    America is part of the battlefield. We firmly believe the war is coming back home,

    I dont care what country you are in or where you are from, if you initiate an act of terror, or act in a war like manor, you should be treated as a combatent.
     
  11. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'd submit that America hasn't been a part of the battlefield since Appamattox. There hasn't, in my recollection, been a single "home" that's been hit by anyone, combatant or not, since then (unless you want to include the Unabomber, maybe). LA Times building, WTC (both times), OKC, Pentagon, (even Pearl Harbor!), etc...none were homes or families.

    Compare that with Europe in two world wars, Israel, Iraq, Vietnam, Congo, Korea, Afghanistan, etc. During those conflicts, people are looted, burned out of homes, bombed from the sky and from cars, shot for food, raped, etc. The average American citizen has no idea how unsanitary war is, and it's because our military is all-volunteer and expeditionary in nature.

    There's also a reason that there's Title X, and posse comitatus. Constitutionally, I understand that you can't treat American citizens like combatants (notwithstanding whatever happened with Al-Awlaki, which still puzzles me).
     
  12. bluefrog

    bluefrog Go Blazers, GO!

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    1,964
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    Programmer
    Location:
    New Bern
    How do know who is a terrorists though? The DHS has listed numerous mundane things as suspicious activity that could constitute terrorism, behavior that includes buying gold, owning guns, using a watch or binoculars, donating to charity, using the telephone or email to find information, using cash, etc....

    http://youtu.be/jHjI6mj1jOA
     
  13. MARIS61

    MARIS61 Real American

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,007
    Likes Received:
    5,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired Yankee
    Location:
    Beautiful Central Oregon
    The actual targets this legislation is aimed at are not terrorists, not immigrants illegal or otherwise, but certain economic classes of American citizens.

    The roundup is going as planned.

    Unless Obama vetoes it as promised, our government will have effectively been overthrown.
     
  14. MARIS61

    MARIS61 Real American

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,007
    Likes Received:
    5,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired Yankee
    Location:
    Beautiful Central Oregon
    Is that a fancy term for a messy house?
     
  15. jlprk

    jlprk The ESPN mod is insane.

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    Messages:
    30,672
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired, while you work!
    This is the type of issue that makes me think, if the Left and the Right ever got together on their points of agreement...intelligence agencies would never let that happen.
     
  16. TradeNurkicNow

    TradeNurkicNow piss

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,196
    Likes Received:
    676
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    hell
    Location:
    shit
    I agree. People in this country tend to look at everything wrong with the government and say, "it's all the [insert the opposite of my political leanings]'s fault!" When, in fact, dems and repubs have more in common than they know, and the real issue is, and always will be, classism. Is there any surprise that all this is happening while #Occupy is going down? Try it again next year, hippies.
     
  17. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,701
    Likes Received:
    2,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    It's not about classism. Republicans don't think that union members are more likely to try to blow up cities, and Democrats don't think that the 1% is, either.

    This is an attempt to stop the "other" from damaging the American way of life. I think (and many agree with me) that it's an overstepping, but the intent (IMO) is not to inhibit hippies or teabaggers. It's to stop foreign influences from crippling us.

    I think that's a legitimate goal--perhaps the single most legit reason for the existence of centralized government--but, again, we cannot sacrifice our citizens at the altar of pubic safety.

    Ed O.
     
  18. jlprk

    jlprk The ESPN mod is insane.

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    Messages:
    30,672
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired, while you work!
    As a lawyer, you probably know many examples of prosecutors making questionable interpretations, stretching laws past original intentions. To harass someone with a terrorism law, the word "terror" can be given an excessively broad definition.
     
  19. MARIS61

    MARIS61 Real American

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,007
    Likes Received:
    5,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired Yankee
    Location:
    Beautiful Central Oregon
    There is no stretching required here. This bill outlaws Free Speech.

    Any person speaking out in any manner of criticism against the criminals who have usurped our Government of the People will be picked up and disappeared for life. Maybe they will be held by the DHS, maybe they will just be dumped in a mass grave.
     
  20. DaLincolnJones

    DaLincolnJones Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2011
    Messages:
    8,319
    Likes Received:
    1,886
    Trophy Points:
    113


    gotta give it to ya Maris, you do make me laugh. on a sid note, just how many years did you give to your country in the military?
     

Share This Page