Steelers interested in Moulds?

Discussion in 'AFC North' started by Uptown, Mar 25, 2006.

  1. Uptown

    Uptown NFLC nflcentral.net Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,151
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    According to PFFFT...<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>STEELERS INTERESTED IN MOULDSA league source tells us that the Pittsburgh Steelers are interested in acquiring receiver Eric Moulds from the Buffalo Bills "if the price is right."In this regard, that could have two meanings. First, there's the price to pay the Bills to get him. Then, there's the price that Moulds will want.Moulds, a ten-year veteran, has twice been asked to take a pay cut for 2006, and has consistently refused. The team recently authorized him to solicit trade offers.He's scheduled to earn $6.089 million in base salary in 2006, and $7.25 million in 2007.The Steelers don't typically break the bank for players from other teams, and Moulds might be willing to take less in Pittsburgh than he could get elsewhere, given the strong likelihood that the Steelers will be in the thick of things again in the 2006 postseason.</div>
     
    Uptown, Mar 25, 2006
    #1
  2. The Marine

    The Marine BBW Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2005
    Messages:
    2,295
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Hmmm.... Very interesting because I do actually like Eric Moulds. He would be a great fit to our system. Wouldnt hurt us to add him to our roster. He can be our number 2 WR
     
    The Marine, Mar 25, 2006
    #2
  3. ThaFranchize

    ThaFranchize BBW Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2005
    Messages:
    1,044
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Yes. I would love to have Moulds on the Steelers. He would most likely be our #2 receiver. Then we could probably draft a quick receiver/returner in the 2nd - 4th round.1 - Hines Ward2 - Eric Moulds3 - Cedric Wilson4 - Fast Rookie 5 - Nate Washington or Quincy MorganThat's pretty good IMO.
     
    ThaFranchize, Mar 25, 2006
    #3
  4. NFLCMS2

    NFLCMS2 NFLC nflcentral.net Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2005
    Messages:
    898
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    I like that a lot two good recievers that make plays and barely drop the ball. Thats good stuff !!
     
    NFLCMS2, Mar 25, 2006
    #4
  5. Chaintime

    Chaintime NFLC nflcentral.net Writing Team

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,118
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Wow didn't expect this, I really thought he would end up in New England. However I'll see how this plans out.
     
    Chaintime, Mar 25, 2006
    #5
  6. JHair

    JHair NFLC nflcentral.net Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2005
    Messages:
    8,595
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ThaFranchize @ Mar 25 2006, 07:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>1 - Hines Ward2 - Eric Moulds3 - Cedric Wilson4 - Fast Rookie 5 - Nate Washington or Quincy MorganThat's pretty good IMO.</div>Yeah, that'd be a sick lineup of recievers...
     
    JHair, Mar 25, 2006
    #6
  7. AdropOFvenom

    AdropOFvenom BBW Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2007
    Messages:
    11,586
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JHair @ Mar 25 2006, 09:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ThaFranchize @ Mar 25 2006, 07:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>1 - Hines Ward2 - Eric Moulds3 - Cedric Wilson4 - Fast Rookie 5 - Nate Washington or Quincy MorganThat's pretty good IMO.</div>Yeah, that'd be a sick lineup of recievers...</div>Yeah, really.....scary enough is that itd be an upgrade from the Super Bowl Champion team.
     
    AdropOFvenom, Mar 25, 2006
    #7

Share This Page