During the Bush campaigns there were a lot of people protesting against it. Like every election. Perfectly normal. The McCain/Palin campaign is down right embarrassing. They have supporters who are going across the line into psycho territory. This isn't normal. The McCain protesters who are going across that line are taking it way too far. Sarah Palin is fueling this as well. Putting the fear into people. The conclusion I have came up with is simple. These people who are taking it way too far - yelling "Kill Him!," "Terrorist!," can't take the prospect of a black man becoming president. The closet racists in the country have let their guard down and have came out of the closet.
Also, the "terrorist" name tag some republicans have labeled Obama is pure desperation. Obama was doing his job. It just so happens he had to deal with Ayers because he was on the board of education in Chicago. Grasping for straws. Pure desperation. Should we anticipate Obama bombing random neighborhoods? rrrrrrrright.
Gee, how convenient. People get riled up about Obama so you just call them "racists." Did you ever think their anger may have something to do with his radical politics??? "Racism" is the card that liberals bring out every time someone tells the truth about Obama.
Because saying "I don't think no blackman is fit to run this country" isn't racist. Right. He's talking about the supporters, not the campaigners, I think.
Uh, take a look at the title of this thread. There are lots of racists out there, and many of them are supporting Obama. They don't have a clue about his policies, they just want a black man in the White House. That's racism.
if by terrible you mean feeble then yes, i agree. anyone who would choose Palin to be a heartbeat away from being the most powerful human on earth, should not be trusted to lead this country.
If the choice is between Palin running the country, or Obama, I'll take Palin every day of the week and twice on Tuesdays.
Says a blind McCain jock rider. Palin is an airhead. What in the world would she do if she didn't have a teleprompter to read from? or speech writers?
You can't judge a campaign by its supporters all the time. So you're saying that he really is a Muslim, and a terrorist? Those are untrue statements, not true ones. To say that there has not been any racism in McCain's campaign shows blind support of him. When that lady made comments about Obama being a Muslim, McCain took the mic from her and say "No he's not a Muslim, he's decent". Basically implying that Muslim people ARE NOT decent. Not all the racism in this campaign has been directed at Obama, and not all of it has been intentional. I do believe that McCain was poorly coached and shows a lack of common sense about things that should not be said.
Heh, heh. The "blind" folks are supporting Obama. And what would Obama do if he didn't have speechwriters, or teleprompters? He's never run a town or a state, and Palin has done both, so who is the less qualiified?
No one with any brains has said Obama is a terrorist. What they HAVE said is that he "pals around with terrorists," which is true. He clearly sympathizes with people like William Ayers and the Rev. Wright, and shares their view of America, or else he wouldn't have attended Wright's church for over 20 years or associated with Bill Ayers, who still has not said he is sorry for the bombings, and wished he could "have done more." I never said that. There is racism on both sides, but the racism on Obama's side never gets pointed out by the media.
Nope, the title is correct in saying campaign, and not supporters. It's not really an Obama is black, he's bad thing. It's, Obama is a Muslim, that's a bad thing! http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/10/va-gop-chief-co.html
Sorry for quoting the past. There is so much racism against Obama. I play CS:S and the amount of ignorant shit I see against him is disturbing. Where is the love? EDIT: Quote fail.
So, given the fact that he is a terrorist sympathizer, a member of a radical religious sect (and obviously a liar) and is the front runner to be the next president of the United States, are you not surprised people are shouting "Kill him!" at McCain rallies? I'm surprised you haven't suggested it yet. Where's your patriotic duty to protect this country from obvious threats against it? Are you still voting for John McCain? He shook hands with Obama! I saw it on TV! He's paling around with Barack Hussein Obama.
I imagine he'd make an honest remark about "spreading the wealth" to a random guy who asked him an unsolicited question. I also imagine that this questioner would be smeared and vetted more thoroughly than Obama by the "journalists" who are supposed to represent the "average Joe".
The Secret Service found no evidence of the "Kill Him" remark. http://www.timesleader.com/news/breakingnews/Secret_Service_says_Kill_him_allegation_unfounded_.html Stay stupid.
You got it. Or he might say something about stupid voters who cling to their guns and their religion. Oh, yes. We can always trust the media to hunt down and destroy the "evil conservatives." That's their specialty.
And that is the main reason why Obama will win the election because anyone that doesn't vote for him (like me and others) will be called racist and other bad names. So a lot of people will vote for Obama from the fear of being called those names. I on the other hand do not worry from such weak accusations, and will vote for McCain, and proudly tell everyone I can here in Mass. that I'm a McCain supporter. And it is true that the Democrats use the race cards 95% of the time.
McCain't couldn't even beat out GW in 2000 for the Republican nominee...GW, arguably one of the worst presidents in the history of the US...and now, all of a sudden, we are supposed to believe that 8 years later McCain't is going to be better than what we just had to suffer through with GW in office??? <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/eKgPY1adc0A&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/eKgPY1adc0A&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
I'm not following this logic. What does losing a primary have to do with what kind of administration a candidate will have?
