So there we are, A team with former glories in the Premier League has been given special dispensation so that their status is not affected. Er Hello?, what former glories to West Ham have other than 1-0 wins over Bradford, Ipswich and Wigan to their name. This is whilst other teams, who are trying to produce glories in the Premier League are having their status threatened at the Premier Leagues lesuire. Every single time, an appeal works and the top teams are given special dispensation i.e. a lenient punishment rather the mandatory punishment that the FAPL's rule book gives. In West Ham's case a minimum 6 point deduction. With the maximum being 3 points deducted per match that season. What gets Sheffield United and Wigan fans backs up is that the Premier League have stated that if the saga had been involving those two clubs - i.e. what West Ham have been found guilty of being done by them or small clubs, points would have been deducted, in effect, the punishment was given because IT WAS WEST HAM WE WERE TALKING ABOUT HERE. The Premier League was looking to prevent small clubs from building a big glory stake in the FAPL. So officially according to the governing body of the game in England, West Ham have not been docked pts because it was them and had it been Wigan, Sheff U or Watford then points would have been deducted. The England is such a Mockery and I call on the 20 clubs to do their best to expose these next season. How about a play-off between a Tevez and Maschierano missing West Ham and Sheff Utd to see whether the illegality of these two "Footballers" was the reason why WHU stayed up. If a Blade, if WH without Tevez and Maschierano beat us then I wouldnt complain about relegation.