As could many more probably... http://investigations.nbcnews.com/_...-guilty-in-online-absentee-ballot-scheme?lite
Is it bad that my first thought was "Don't be a Dem, don't be a Dem, wait BP posted this, OF COURSE it's going to be a Dem."
This just proves that 99.9% of "ballot fraud" is way too sophisticated to be preventable by requiring picture ID when you vote.
In today's news, Diebold is guilty of bribing. This is the biggest company that counts our votes using computers (votes can no longer be counted by honest little old ladies), the company which promised Republicans a win if they would choose Diebold over its competitors. After the corrupt 2004 "Bush victory," the most obviously crooked results (out of several contending states) was Ohio, home of Diebold's corporate headquarters. U.S. Government fines Diebold $48 million today http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie...MENT?SITE=MABED&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT Republican congressmen aided Diebold's fraud http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2013/10/north_cantons_diebold_got_trad.html I'm sure that Republican blogs which want photo ID and weeks of pre-registration waits to decrease votes from the poor, will cover this story to fight ballot fraud.
