lol Well... You started saying in the other thread that it takes little to do what someone like me does...We do 2 different things. A person that paints on a canvas and makes art like that would put your art down... Saying it was made by a simple computer program.But... I can respect what you do.As for the sig, I'd have no clue this is a guy from Velvet Revolver unless you stated it in the topic. I'd want to see his face to atleast identify him. Usually in sigs, there's some sort of textwork too.Background is nice though.BTW - The wall you posted was very nice and flashy. What is it supposed to be? (not being ignorant, just wondering)
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Bled11Harr3 @ Sep 1 2005, 01:01 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>lol Well... You started saying in the other thread that it takes little to do what someone like me does...We do 2 different things. A person that paints on a canvas and makes art like that would put your art down... Saying it was made by a simple computer program.But... I can respect what you do.As for the sig, I'd have no clue this is a guy from Velvet Revolver unless you stated it in the topic. I'd want to see his face to atleast identify him. Usually in sigs, there's some sort of textwork too.Background is nice though.BTW - The wall you posted was very nice and flashy. What is it supposed to be? (not being ignorant, just wondering)</div> 1. reason i chose to cutoff the top of his face was for two reasons, first that I thought it would give some aestheticness to the sig, and 2, i wanted to use that size template, but also include some of rest of the body, without making the stock smaller.2. Digital Art, and Traditional art ARE TWO DIFFERENT MEDIUMS, there are things you can do on a "simple computer program" that can do many more detailed things than someone on with paints and an easel.Once you start talking about programs like C4D, and Vue, youll understand what I mean. You cant compare the two, Digital Art is almost as different from regular art, as a Mexican Woman is from a hamster, two different species almost entirely.3. The wall i made wasnt really supposed to "be" anything, more along the lines of demenstrating flow on a canvas, like the direction of a waterfall, all crashing down to a central area.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (LiquidOrange @ Sep 1 2005, 09:17 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>1. reason i chose to cutoff the top of his face was for two reasons, first that I thought it would give some aestheticness to the sig, and 2, i wanted to use that size template, but also include some of rest of the body, without making the stock smaller.2. Digital Art, and Traditional art ARE TWO DIFFERENT MEDIUMS, there are things you can do on a "simple computer program" that can do many more detailed things than someone on with paints and an easel.Once you start talking about programs like C4D, and Vue, youll understand what I mean. You cant compare the two, Digital Art is almost as different from regular art, as a Mexican Woman is from a hamster, two different species almost entirely.3. The wall i made wasnt really supposed to "be" anything, more along the lines of demenstrating flow on a canvas, like the direction of a waterfall, all crashing down to a central area.</div> Ehh... Ok, but I've had experiences with those programs... And I think you over generalized people who do the kind of graphics we do.Besides... I'm putting use out of my wallpapers and sigs. Why would I make anything else if I'm not going to use it?The stuff you do, while it does require more skill in certain areas, exploits some of your flaws. Most of the graphic art I see like yours is just a big render with any text slapped on in the corner and no main picture... That is what I work with. Oh well, hopefully you understand what I'm saying.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Bled11Harr3 @ Sep 1 2005, 01:28 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (LiquidOrange @ Sep 1 2005, 09:17 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'> 1. reason i chose to cutoff the top of his face was for two reasons, first that I thought it would give some aestheticness to the sig, and 2, i wanted to use that size template, but also include some of rest of the body, without making the stock smaller.2. Digital Art, and Traditional art ARE TWO DIFFERENT MEDIUMS, there are things you can do on a "simple computer program" that can do many more detailed things than someone on with paints and an easel.Once you start talking about programs like C4D, and Vue, youll understand what I mean. You cant compare the two, Digital Art is almost as different from regular art, as a Mexican Woman is from a hamster, two different species almost entirely.3. The wall i made wasnt really supposed to "be" anything, more along the lines of demenstrating flow on a canvas, like the direction of a waterfall, all crashing down to a central area.</div>Ehh... Ok, but I've had experiences with those programs... And I think you over generalized people who do the kind of graphics we do.Besides... I'm putting use out of my wallpapers and sigs. Why would I make anything else if I'm not going to use it?The stuff you do, while it does require more skill in certain areas, exploits some of your flaws. Most of the graphic art I see like yours is just a big render with any text slapped on in the corner and no main picture... That is what I work with. Oh well, hopefully you understand what I'm saying. </div> Yes i do understand what you're getting at, but by graphics art like mine ,what do you mean? Also by render, do you mean the the render on the left or right, or the misused term "render" reffering to the stock, or the guy in the picture.? And how do i have "no main picture and any text" when there IS a main picture which is the focus of the sig, and NO text at all?
actually, the misused word for you is "stock". I dont know where you got that from ut all it does is sound stupid and confuse people. How bout calling it the... MAIN PICTURESorry, not likin this one bit. Dont like where the pic is placed. Dont like the bg, no border, and no text. Looks like a 1 minute sig.3/10
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Elevation @ Sep 1 2005, 03:53 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>actually, the misused word for you is "stock". I dont know where you got that from ut all it does is sound stupid and confuse people. How bout calling it the... MAIN PICTURESorry, not likin this one bit. Dont like where the pic is placed. Dont like the bg, no border, and no text. Looks like a 1 minute sig.3/10</div> i dont know if ive seen a more ignorant post 1. Stock is the word used ALL AROUND GFX Art, google "stock photo" and you'll get the definition im telling you. that is the correct word. 2. It was actually a 30 minute sig, but ill admit it wasnt one of my better works. I dont see how it "looks" like one though. Is there not enough detail for you like the staples in most of the sigs here, scanlines, border, etc.
you need to chill out man. You act like we are bad proffesionals. When most of us haven't been doing this for only 4 months lol. Just chill.
Liquid Oranage,if you cannot take the criticism then please do not post.It seems like all you do around here is argue with people.You need to relax man,its only graphics.This is your only warning.If it happens again,we will be forced to suspend you.TOPIC CLOSED.If you have an questions or concerns,please pm me.
