ehhh I wouldn't reccomend using c4ds unless you learn how to use them better from someone good at them. The second one would be better w/o the c4d imo. They're both pretty much just averaged or a little below average. Keep working at it though.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (iversonfan268 @ Jan 21 2007, 04:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>ehhh I wouldn't reccomend using c4ds unless you learn how to use them better from someone good at them. The second one would be better w/o the c4d imo. They're both pretty much just averaged or a little below average. Keep working at it though.</div>
MATTHEW! TEACH ME HOW TO USE C4D'S PROPERLY!Because I know a lot of godly sites that use C4D's in a godly way and I wanna learn how to use 'em first.
I actually like the 2nd one much more than the 1st. I really don't like the text in the 1st, it's really plain. I love the renders you used in the 2nd one, and the text and the phrase is nice.
Yeah Nitro, go ahead and use it, as long as I get some type of credit. And I'm surprised, the second one got REALLY good reviews at another site. They said I used the C4D perfectly And dsounG, I don't really know how to teach people to use it. Just mess with the color balance, maybe set it to linear dodge, etc.And I used a stock on the first one, believe it or not.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (7Goat @ Jan 21 2007, 03:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Yeah Nitro, go ahead and use it, as long as I get some type of credit. And I'm surprised, the second one got REALLY good reviews at another site. They said I used the C4D perfectly And dsounG, I don't really know how to teach people to use it. Just mess with the color balance, maybe set it to linear dodge, etc.And I used a stock on the first one, believe it or not.</div>Can you post a link to the site?
Gosh, that first sig is sick IMO. I would give it at least a 9/10. The text is amazing, the background is really nice, and there isnt too much going on which I love. Great job man!
