Walker: Collective-bargaining law doesn’t save money

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by MrJayremmie, Apr 16, 2011.

  1. MrJayremmie

    MrJayremmie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    3,438
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Thought this deserved its own thread...

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_thelo...r-collective-bargaining-law-doesnt-save-money

     
  2. MrJayremmie

    MrJayremmie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    3,438
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Wasn't his main argument about the fiscal problem, and that this needed to happen? And if it didn't pass, he would lay off a ton of government employees?

    Looks like he will be voted out by a landslide once the next election comes around.
     
  3. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,976
    Likes Received:
    10,655
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
  4. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    The change to payments of pension plans and medical benifits was what saved the money. The changes of collective bargaining rights was to ensure that the money saved wasn't made up in future benefit negotiations outside of wages, which can still be negotiated. So, had Walker said that that CBA rights for extra benefits would save money in this budget, he would have been lying.


    Looks like you don't know what you're talking about, as usual, and this certainly isn't worth its own thread when there is a huge thread already about Wisconsin.
     
    Last edited: Apr 16, 2011
  5. maxiep

    maxiep RIP Dr. Jack

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,291
    Likes Received:
    5,854
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Merchant Banker
    Location:
    Denver, CO & Lake Oswego, OR
    Of course it didn't save any money right now; they're still under the current contract. Wait until the new contract. It was also meant for the local municpalites more than the State. THAT's where the real savings will come from.

    Nice try though. It's a fun little trick Rep. Kucinich does; ask questions that only reveal part of the truth, and only the truth you wish to see.
     
  6. maxiep

    maxiep RIP Dr. Jack

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,291
    Likes Received:
    5,854
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Merchant Banker
    Location:
    Denver, CO & Lake Oswego, OR
  7. MARIS61

    MARIS61 Real American

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,007
    Likes Received:
    5,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired Yankee
    Location:
    Beautiful Central Oregon
    His new budget will keep property taxes from rising more than 1% each of the next two years

    This is an obvious lie. It's like saying the budget will prevent gravity from failing.

    Property taxes in Wisconsin will not rise more than 1% each of the next two years ANYWAY. They will likely fall as property values continue to plummet.
     
  8. maxiep

    maxiep RIP Dr. Jack

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,291
    Likes Received:
    5,854
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Merchant Banker
    Location:
    Denver, CO & Lake Oswego, OR
    Yeah, because government would never dramatically raise millage rates and property taxes are always based on current appraisal value.

    Time to go back for CE; putting your picture on a card and calling yourself a REALTOR isn't enough.
     

Share This Page