we should have signed james posey!!!

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by ehizzy3, Dec 13, 2008.

Moderators: 7

Moderators

  1. BrianFromWA
  2. Chris Craig
  3. Darkwebs
  4. Ed O
  5. PtldPlatypus
  6. SlyPokerDog
  7. Strenuus
  1. ehizzy3

    ehizzy3 RIP mgb

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    10,163
    Likes Received:
    6,339
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Hillsboro/Bogotá
    i was saying this in the offseason and no one seemed to agree with me. he would bring toughness, perimeter defense, and vet experience-he has won 2 titles
     
    ehizzy3, Dec 13, 2008
    #1
  2. julius

    julius I wonder if there's beer on the sun Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    44,405
    Likes Received:
    32,708
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Vagabond
    Location:
    Water Valley, Alberta Ca
    Saying that we should have signed him doesn't mean that we had a chance and squandered it.
     
    julius, Dec 13, 2008
    #2
  3. ehizzy3

    ehizzy3 RIP mgb

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    10,163
    Likes Received:
    6,339
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Hillsboro/Bogotá
    um what? its not like he got a max deal.....
     
    ehizzy3, Dec 13, 2008
    #3
  4. julius

    julius I wonder if there's beer on the sun Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    44,405
    Likes Received:
    32,708
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Vagabond
    Location:
    Water Valley, Alberta Ca
    That doesn't matter. It's not like Portland offered him something and he refused. You do realize that because fans might want a player to sign in Portland, it doesn't mean that the player wanted to, or that it was a realistic thing, right?

    Man, we should've signed Baron Davis!
     
    julius, Dec 13, 2008
    #4
  5. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR

    So you would overbid just to get James Posey? What would that accomplish?
     
    PapaG, Dec 13, 2008
    #5
  6. anonymous gambler

    anonymous gambler Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    693
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I'll agree with you on this one- he would have been a helpful veteran presence with decent d. We should have tried to sign him- though I can see him picking NO over us.
     
    anonymous gambler, Dec 13, 2008
    #6
  7. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    How do you know the Blazers didn't try to sign him? Other than having zero cap space, of course.
     
    PapaG, Dec 13, 2008
    #7
  8. B-Roy

    B-Roy If it takes months

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    31,402
    Likes Received:
    24,364
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Is it that important whether we tried to sign him or not?
     
    B-Roy, Dec 13, 2008
    #8
  9. anonymous gambler

    anonymous gambler Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    693
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    18
    We had the midlevel exception- which he ended up taking.
     
    anonymous gambler, Dec 13, 2008
    #9
  10. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    MLE with luxury tax ramifications in the future though, right? I ask this as a legitimate question.
     
    PapaG, Dec 13, 2008
    #10
  11. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    Yes. A poster started a rumor that the Blazers should have signed him, so it is a legit thread!
     
    PapaG, Dec 13, 2008
    #11
  12. maxiep

    maxiep RIP Dr. Jack

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,291
    Likes Received:
    5,854
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Merchant Banker
    Location:
    Denver, CO & Lake Oswego, OR
    Why tie up the mid-level when we're hoping for cap space in 2009?
     
    maxiep, Dec 13, 2008
    #12
  13. ehizzy3

    ehizzy3 RIP mgb

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    10,163
    Likes Received:
    6,339
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Hillsboro/Bogotá
    i didnt start a rumor. i was saying we should have signed him back in the summer, and i'm saying it now. if you dont think posey would help us your crazy
     
    Last edited: Dec 14, 2008
    ehizzy3, Dec 14, 2008
    #13
  14. #1_War_Poet_ForLife

    #1_War_Poet_ForLife The Baker of Cakes

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2007
    Messages:
    9,176
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    48
    He wouldn't have been worth it on this team.
     
    #1_War_Poet_ForLife, Dec 14, 2008
    #14
  15. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,684
    Likes Received:
    2,779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Not a fan of Posey, myself. Would he make this team better, today, if we had offered (and he had accepted) the max MLE? Almost certainly.

    Would it help us in the long run, when his contract would be biting into the cap space we have and taking up minutes that are probably going to be helpful for Batum and Webster and Rudy and Bayless to grow as players? I seriously doubt it.

    Ed O.
     
    Ed O, Dec 14, 2008
    #15
  16. anonymous gambler

    anonymous gambler Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    693
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    18
    It's 6 million- we could have him and still have cap space- would just have to renounce Frye and Blake.
     
    anonymous gambler, Dec 14, 2008
    #16
  17. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,034
    Likes Received:
    24,899
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    Well, he did make 6 three-pointers today. But on the other hand, the blazers didn't play today. So I'm not sure if he would really have had that much effect.

    barfo
     
    barfo, Dec 14, 2008
    #17
  18. anonymous gambler

    anonymous gambler Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    693
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I actually like the idea of adding Ron Artest better. I think our team chemistry is good enough to handle one knuckleball and I think he has the talent to help us contend next year. He'd immediately improve our perimeter defense. I'd offer him 30million over three years with a team option for an extra year.

    Of course, this is assuming we can't get Kobe! !!!
     
    anonymous gambler, Dec 14, 2008
    #18
  19. MrJayremmie

    MrJayremmie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    3,438
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Artest's toughness and D would be good on our team, but certainly not his offense. There is one ball to go around. By next year we will have 3 legit options on our first unit, and then Rudy, Jerryd, Outlaw comin' off the bench. IDK if you have seen Ron play, but he gets shot happy a lot, and likes to iso a lot. Someone like Battier would bring vet exp. and good defense but wouldn't demand shots on offense. I think he is a better choice.
     
    MrJayremmie, Dec 15, 2008
    #19
  20. BatumKaboom

    BatumKaboom Suspended

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2008
    Messages:
    558
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    roffle
     
    BatumKaboom, Dec 15, 2008
    #20

Share This Page