What is our goal for this upcoming year?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by maxiep, May 24, 2013.

?

What should be our goal for 2013-14

  1. Build on our current roster, use our cap space and go for the playoffs

    64.7%
  2. Trade some assets for a vet, use our cap space and go for the playoffs

    17.6%
  3. Keep our cap space, use our picks, stay young and see what happens

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. Keep our cap space, trade some assets for future ones, tank and look toward 2014-15

    17.6%
  1. maxiep

    maxiep RIP Dr. Jack

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,303
    Likes Received:
    5,884
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Merchant Banker
    Location:
    Denver, CO & Lake Oswego, OR
    Do we want to make the playoffs or is this a year where perhaps we should take a step back to hopefully take two steps forward in 2014?
     
  2. The_Lillard_King

    The_Lillard_King Westside

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    12,405
    Likes Received:
    310
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I think we lose Aldridge if we don't go forward from this point on (if we haven't already lost him)
     
  3. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    24,196
    Likes Received:
    30,334
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    If the plan is to step back next season, then trading LMA for younger assets is definitely the way to go. Unless there's a step forward this year, I don't see him sticking around. Nope, for me, this is the year that the Blazers have to have a good summer and put the team in a position to make the playoffs and, perhaps, win a first round series.
     
  4. maxiep

    maxiep RIP Dr. Jack

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,303
    Likes Received:
    5,884
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Merchant Banker
    Location:
    Denver, CO & Lake Oswego, OR
    Do you see this roster as having the assets to build a team that can win a first round series? I don't, but I'm not the keenest basketball mind on this board.
     
  5. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,778
    Likes Received:
    27,535
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What is, and what should be are two different answers for me. A is really the only answer it can be, right? We don't have the assets for B, and C and D would mean losing Aldridge, which I don't think the team wants to do.

    For me anyway, it looks like NBA purgatory for the Blazers. Not good or bad enough to matter
     
  6. BBert

    BBert Weasels Ripped My Flesh

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,628
    Likes Received:
    20,308
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Poster Boy
    Location:
    Blazerlandia
    I'm convinced Paul Allen's answer is Option A or B: Build on our current roster/trade some assets, use our cap space and go for the playoffs

    I think a better long-term plan would be Option D: Keep our cap space, trade some assets for future ones, develop our young assets and look toward 2014-15

    That is most likely the "Trade LaMarcus" scenario.

    I get that most fans are probably tired of Option D. I'm kind of tired of it myself. But I think I have enough left in the tank to give it another round. Sadly, Paul Allen may not.

    (Edit: No pun intended. Freudian maybe?)
     
    Last edited: May 24, 2013
    PtldPlatypus likes this.
  7. MARIS61

    MARIS61 Real American

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,007
    Likes Received:
    5,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired Yankee
    Location:
    Beautiful Central Oregon
    There is only one goal for any sports team, and that is a championship.

    If you're using phrases like cap space or concerned about paying the luxury tax, you're not serious about winning a championship and probably never will.
     
  8. EL PRESIDENTE

    EL PRESIDENTE Username Retired in Honor of Lanny.

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    50,346
    Likes Received:
    22,532
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Trading LA for "young assets" is completely ludicrous at this point. He's proven, he's not injury prone and he's on a reasonable contract. He gets along with Lillard and the core of our players. We have enough "young players with potential", we don't need any more...at some point you just need to stop that line of thought and just build. The ONLY thing that would be worth it would be to tank for Andrew Wiggins...but then you have to shut down Lillard all next year, Batum and Aldridge..even then that's pretty much out of reach.


    What, so we can see another one of our players go far in the playoffs and wonder "why didn't he do that in Portland".


    We have money to get some more talent, we should do it. I think getting into the playoffs and past the first round is the goal. Obviously, a championship is the goal as alluded...but are we really that far talentwise from say an Indiana Pacers or a Memphis Grizzlies who are in the conference finals? Just get a few more pieces and tweak.
     
    Last edited: May 24, 2013
  9. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    23,197
    Likes Received:
    15,650
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I say 1 or 3.

    You guys are worrying too much about LMA. We have him for two more years. If we fuck up this summer AND next summer then you can start worrying.

    We need two things, an exciting young SG to go with Lillard and Nic. (Trading up to get Oladipo would be ideal even if we use Wes, and a big space eater to
    do the dirty work in the middle. (along with Leonard)

    We can do it all this summer. If we can't get that young guard in the draft then draft another center. Next year would end up being another re-building year, but save the cap space and get a guard next summer. (And/or pray that Barton makes a big jump)
     
  10. EL PRESIDENTE

    EL PRESIDENTE Username Retired in Honor of Lanny.

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    50,346
    Likes Received:
    22,532
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Rising superstar in the making in Damian Lillard.
    One of the best PFs in the league in his prime.
    Two very solid wing players who are good shooters and defenders
    Few spats of random young talent

    Just need a big man and some bench players and we're a team that can definitely compete out west. Most of the teams are on the decline when you look at it. Spurs will be done. Lakers are fucked. Grizzlies are peaked. Warriors are getting better. Thunder lost Harden. Clippers in disarray.

    We have an "ok" draft pick and some cap space to get some players.

    Its not a bad situation to be in. But yeah, let's just blow it up right now. smh, some of y'all never learn.
     
  11. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,778
    Likes Received:
    27,535
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This is obviously correct, but while it has happened before...I think?, going from lottery team to NBA champions is a task that probably would fail miserably. You have to walk before you can run.

    Teams in the lottery should absolutely be building towards a championship, but not necessarily in one year. I do not think that the Blazers share my beliefs though
     
  12. maxiep

    maxiep RIP Dr. Jack

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,303
    Likes Received:
    5,884
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Merchant Banker
    Location:
    Denver, CO & Lake Oswego, OR
    Crap! I meant to have the question be, "What do you think our goal should be for next year?"

    Sorry for the confusion. I was looking for opinions on what you would like to see, not what the Blazers will do.
     
  13. donkiez

    donkiez Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Messages:
    4,235
    Likes Received:
    3,260
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Playoffs or bust this year. Reevaluate LMA situation at the end of the year.
     
  14. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,778
    Likes Received:
    27,535
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh then that's different.

    Our goal should be option D. Lillard is the guy right now you can build around. Matthews and batum are basically 17 million dollars in glue guys, and LA is a 14 million dollar second option. The model is broken.
     
  15. Blazinaway

    Blazinaway Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    11,044
    Likes Received:
    4,321
    Trophy Points:
    113
    that depends on what Neal gets done in the next 1-2 months. If we can't get the parts we need and really compete then I think by the trade deadline we might think about making some huge changes - like trading LMA and others
     
  16. Charcoal Filtered

    Charcoal Filtered Writing Team

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2009
    Messages:
    4,748
    Likes Received:
    2,420
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think you have to take advantage of an opportunity when it presents itself. Look at how Boston won its last championship. Ainge's strategy was to accumulate young players and tank. After he lost out on Oden and Durant, his backup plan of trading youth for future HOFers with limited time left played out perfectly.
     
  17. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    24,196
    Likes Received:
    30,334
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    Olshey has his work cut out for him, but if things break right then yes, I think it's within reach. Obviously, you don't have a good shot if you're a 7 or 8 seed in the West, but if you end up in the 5th or 6th spot it's doable. Get a serviceable center, a backup PG and add a vet or two on minimum contracts and beating the Nuggets, Warriors, Grizzlies or Clippers in a 7 game series doesn't seem out of reach. Of course, the Lakers, Jazz, Mavs and T'Wolves will be looking to join the party too, so as in all seasons, a good bit of luck and avoiding the injury bug will play as big a part as anything Olshey can pull off.
     
  18. Blazinaway

    Blazinaway Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    11,044
    Likes Received:
    4,321
    Trophy Points:
    113
    IMO we need some luck or have to gamble. The luck would be Howard goes to HOU and Asik becomes available, if we could get Asik for the #10 and capspace (maybe add filler?) that would be huge for us. The other choice is take a chance on Andy Varajeo, I KNOW he is a huge risk because of his injury history but frankly he's the only other guy that might move the needle enough for us - if he could stay healthy he'd be a perfect C. The good part about Andy is that it's 9 mil this yr and only 4 mil guaranteed in 2014.
     
  19. Boise Blazer

    Boise Blazer Thread Lightly

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2008
    Messages:
    7,262
    Likes Received:
    2,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think bare minimum we have to make the playoffs. If they want to go all in and even go over the cap for a few years all the way down preserving cap space for next years free agency, whatever fine. I thinks its imperative that this team at the very least to get some playoff experience next year and at least get a taste of playoffs to motivate them for the future. Im afraid without playoff experience whatever plan they may have could backfire and start to get players and fans alike a little too disgruntled.
     
  20. Boise Blazer

    Boise Blazer Thread Lightly

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2008
    Messages:
    7,262
    Likes Received:
    2,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I agree that the other thing that needs to happen is a combo of a little luck and taking a chance somewhere.
     

Share This Page