What would it take to get Lowry?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by magnifier661, Dec 11, 2013.

  1. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
  2. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,687
    Likes Received:
    13,094
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I feel like I might be the only one still happy we have Mo WIlliams on this team. That ship sure floated away quickly.
     
  3. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    I love me some Mo, but Lowry is a true PG that can score to boot. He is much better than Mo, IMO.
     
  4. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,687
    Likes Received:
    13,094
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "true" PG? He's not all that different from Mo this season passing the ball. Lowry's stats on top, Mo next

    GP
    19
    21
    MPG
    36.7
    24.9
    APG
    6.8
    4.3
    Passes per game
    68.9
    42.4
    Total AST
    130
    90
    FT Assists per game
    .6
    .2
    Secondary Assists per game
    .9
    .7

    Assist opportunities per game
    13.5
    8.3

    Points created by assist per game
    15.7
    10.2
    Points Created by AST Per 48 Min
    20.5
    19.7
     
  5. noknobs

    noknobs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    4,911
    Likes Received:
    6,292
    Trophy Points:
    113
    To me, the last thing we need is another guard, especially if CJ is coming back soon. I'm still happy with Mo for the most part.
     
  6. Samuel

    Samuel James “Hollywood” Robinson

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,979
    Likes Received:
    1,857
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm not sure if we have much to interest them in a one-to-one trade. He has an expiring deal so we'd have to give back promising prospects, picks, or cap relief for this season (so give them back less than 6M). We can't deal any first rounders, I'm not sure a 2nd rounder would do it, and our prospects pool that we'd want to give up is a bit thin.

    One would have to come up with a scenario where we give up a guy or two to another team, they send a cheaper player and a player exception to Toronto and we take on Lowry's contract.
     
  7. Samuel

    Samuel James “Hollywood” Robinson

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,979
    Likes Received:
    1,857
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Totally agree. The rub with trading scenarios is we don't really know what we have until CJ comes back but he won't be back until after that December date that eliminates trade deadline possibilities.
     
  8. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Stats might be similar, but defensively I see Lowry creating quite a bit of separation and they play the game very differently. Lowry is more of a pick-and-roll player, whereas Mo is probably more of a pull-up shooter. I know Mo's assist numbers look OK, but I don't think he does a great job of getting bigs involved, I suspect Lowry would be a a help for guys like Freeland, Lopez and Robinson on pick and rolls or pick and pop situations.
     
  9. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
  10. Wizard Mentor

    Wizard Mentor Wizard Mentor

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    14,625
    Likes Received:
    14,851
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Master of Xen Foro
    Location:
    La Grande, OR
  11. tlongII

    tlongII Legendary Poster

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    17,235
    Likes Received:
    11,908
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Systems Analyst
    Location:
    Beaverton, Oregon
    We definitely don't need another guard at this point. We could use some depth at center and that's about it.
     
  12. blue9

    blue9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Messages:
    10,729
    Likes Received:
    7,169
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You guys realize that we'd have to ship someone out - likely a guard, and even more likely it'd be Mo plus another player - in order to get Lowry, right? So he wouldn't be an addition to our back court, he'd be a replacement.
     
  13. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't see the need for a depth at center as mutually exclusive; I think we need both.
     
  14. blue9

    blue9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Messages:
    10,729
    Likes Received:
    7,169
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yup - one back-up PG and one more C (either starting or back-up).
    I still wonder if we should take a chance on Kendall Marshall. Low risk, since he wouldn't play any minutes unless he earned them. I'd cut Barton to take a chance on Marshall.
    Then somehow make a trade for Drummond and we end up with Robinson (#5), Lillard (36), Drummond (#9), and Marshall (#13)! Maybe swap CJ for Lamb (who we should have taken instead of Leonard!)? Haha!
     
  15. BlazerWookee

    BlazerWookee UNTILT THE DAMN PINWHEEL!

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    13,195
    Likes Received:
    6,535
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Gear Finisher
    Location:
    Lebanon, Oregon
    It would take Olshey having a frontal lobotomy. If your car's running great, no need to change the spark plugs...
     
  16. blue9

    blue9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Messages:
    10,729
    Likes Received:
    7,169
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But how about the timing belt? You just wait for it to break before you change it out?
     
  17. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Mo isn't playing great. In fact you could argue he's barely above replacement level.
     
  18. BlazerWookee

    BlazerWookee UNTILT THE DAMN PINWHEEL!

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    13,195
    Likes Received:
    6,535
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Gear Finisher
    Location:
    Lebanon, Oregon
    Absolutely, unless you must venture out of the area in which your insurance will cover towing your car to your favorite mechanic, in which case it might be worth being proactive rather than reactive...
     
  19. Wizard Mentor

    Wizard Mentor Wizard Mentor

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    14,625
    Likes Received:
    14,851
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Master of Xen Foro
    Location:
    La Grande, OR
    In support, let me say this: Who do people think will be coming off the bench for the Blazers in 2 years?

    Hint: it probably won't be Mo and Joel.

     
  20. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    I'm gonna have to agree with you on this. I have hope Mo will come around and do well, but his turn over issue is a huge problem. Also, I don't like how he has become so "crawford-like" with ISO shooting as well. If he could just distribute more and get Dame involved at SG, then we wouldn't be having this discussion.
     

Share This Page