What would you consider a successful offseason FA wise?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by OregonHuskerMan, Apr 1, 2013.

  1. OregonHuskerMan

    OregonHuskerMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    1,388
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    West Linn
    As the title suggests, what would be deemed a success/failure?

    Key targets? What areas of need must we address? Do you forego free agency for a big time trade, maybe?

    Al Jefferson, Tyreke Evans, Andre Iguoudala in that order, for me.

    Assuming Dwight/Josh smith don't want to come.
     
  2. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,386
    Likes Received:
    12,522
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Success will be adding at a minimum one new starter, and one good bench piece that could be a solid 6th man candidate for us.
     
  3. chris_in_pdx

    chris_in_pdx OLD MAN

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    4,816
    Likes Received:
    1,900
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think an upgrade at SG would be a priority. If a starting Center can be had for piece parts, then go for it, but I see Leonard developing into the kind of athletic center that will compliment Lillard perfectly.

    If both could be obtained by trading high on LaMarcus and signing Hickson at a reasonable 4 year deal, then I would say go for it.

    For better or worse, Batum is the long term answer at SF.

    Also, bench pieces, bench pieces, bench pieces.
     
  4. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,291
    Likes Received:
    26,830
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Success for me would be adding the right center, as well as improving our bench. I have no names in particular, but not someone like Jefferson or Pekovic
     
  5. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    22,718
    Likes Received:
    15,153
    Trophy Points:
    113
    To me it depends on the draft. To we get the pick? Do we trade the pick to move up? Do we trade the pick to secure an unbalanced trade? I think the #12th pick has value long term.

    What we do on draft day will determine what position we go after in the FA market and how much money we will have to spend. Maybe we go after a SG in the draft. maybe another center drops to us that has potential bu is not quite ready now. But if we draft a center then I say go after Jermaine O'neal for a year AND a SG. If we draft a SG or SF then I think we put all our money towards a Center and go with Wes, Batum, and Lillard next year at SG, (but make sure we keep Maynor)

    Lot of options.
     
  6. maxiep

    maxiep RIP Dr. Jack

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,291
    Likes Received:
    5,854
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Merchant Banker
    Location:
    Denver, CO & Lake Oswego, OR
    These goals I think are incompatible, but here's what I'd like to see happen:

    1. Re-sign Maynor and Hickson, or find players of equivalent or better talent at PG, PF/C (backup quality).

    2. Find a SG that is good enough to relegate Matthews to the bench, which is the role for which he was signed.

    3. Sign a backup veteran center than can be a big body, six fouls and can be a tutor for Leonard.

    If Matthews and Hickson are coming off the bench due to better players starting in front of them, we can be a playoff team.
     
  7. DaLincolnJones

    DaLincolnJones Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2011
    Messages:
    8,319
    Likes Received:
    1,885
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Im right there with you on these with the exceptin of Meyers and the confidence that he will be ready next year..Hickson, Matthews, Meyers and Maynor all off the bench would be a good bench
     
  8. Blazinaway

    Blazinaway Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    10,976
    Likes Received:
    4,257
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I would love to get Asik if HOU signed Dwight, otherwise he would not be available
     
  9. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Dwight Howard!
     
  10. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    A defensive upgrade over Hickson on the front-line, a decent back-up PG who is a veteran, and a bench scorer who is a wing. I also expect Leonard to be a solid rotation contributor next year behind LMA and whoever replaces Hickson.
     
  11. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,386
    Likes Received:
    12,522
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Pretty much this. I want a new starter at C, but am not TOO worried about it being a long term fit. A short term fit to ease Leonard's transition to starter.
     
  12. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    Maybe also getting lucky in the lottery and adding that scorer. Even drafting at 11 or 12, those players are available. Glenn Robinson III could be available.
     
  13. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,386
    Likes Received:
    12,522
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Possibly so, but I'd prefer that gunner off the bench to be a vet, personally. Can be a younger vet, but one who knows how to get buckets in the league, preferably.
     
  14. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    Yeah, I see your point and agree with it. Maybe, just MAYBE, though, some help can be found in the draft, with the vet bench scorer only getting a 2-year deal. In this NBA, bargains can be had for cheap. Look at JJ Hickson, flawed as he is in terms of being a starter for a contending team. At $4m, his strengths have been a bargain this year at that price.
     
  15. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,386
    Likes Received:
    12,522
    Trophy Points:
    113
    oh yeah, I agree that there'll be help in the draft potentially, if we don't use the pick to add a vet at C or something.
     

Share This Page