Why the hell do the knicks want all the bulls? Im getting tired of it. Like if Bulls want marbury or steve. I trust paxson to make the best move. But can the knicks try getting better with out taken Bull players. And i know Paxson doesnt want crawford back. I mean we traded crawford or O.Harrington. What makes you think we will trade Gordon for crawford????I. Thomas needs to look else where
I don't think we would trade Crawford, and I don't think the Bulls want him back. I think if we could get rid of Marbs or Francis I would be ecstatic! I don't know why the Bulls would get rid of Gordon, though.They've got Hinrich, Gordon, Deng/Nocioni and they have a top 5 PG in the league, a top 10 SG in the league (one of the best 3pt shooters) and Nocioni is a great shooter and Deng is a good player (don't know much about him though)...they are all young and set for the future with Chandler at C now they need a PF..I wonder if we would trade Channing Frye..I wouldn't be against trading Frye this way we'd have Curry at C and David Lee at PF..it might be for the better..but Crawford would hit the bench.
No way Paxson wants marbury or steve's contract. Hes not stupid. Cause those guys cant help us win. So theres no need to go after them
Exactly. The Bulls should not be going after any Knicks unless their name is Channing Frye or David Lee. And Frye is gunna be one tough cookie to get. If a Knicks/Bulls deal happens, it most likely wouldn't be best for the Bulls. I say keep the youth movement going. The Bulls have a lot of young stars and they need to keep that core together and hope for the best when drafting. Not to mention some cap space (but I would save it to re-sign the young stars).
The Bulls actually should probably want to drop one of their guards. They're really stacked with them, and they can't be a title contender with just guards. I say, they trade one of their triple guard threat (Gordon, Hinrich and Duhon) for a big man. Doesn't have to be with the Knicks, especially since they don't have any solid big men.
the chances of ben gordon coming to the knicks is the same as me becoming the next michael jordan. it's not happening. he's too clutch and way too good to trade. he'll be an all-star next season.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (nykfan4life @ May 20 2006, 01:11 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>the chances of ben gordon coming to the knicks is the same as me becoming the next michael jordan. it's not happening. he's too clutch and way too good to trade. he'll be an all-star next season.</div>then why were there gordon for pierce rumors?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (KhAoS-CelticsFahLyfe @ May 25 2006, 07:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>then why were there gordon for pierce rumors?</div>i think he was more reffering to him being traded to the Knicks
