He would have got 10\10 at least I bet you. And don't just say "we lost by more then 10" blah blah... I think he would have made more of a difference then Bayless did. I also am starting to like Sergio a lot again. He is showing he can be a tough guy and has the balls to say something to the other team. As does Batum.
Wow, I really thought Bayless outplayed Sergio....and Blake tonight. Pretty easily too. He misses some shots, but his defense is light year ahead of either of them, and his attack first mentality is what will help this team win games if he's ever able to actually play and get some rhythm.
David Lee would have helped a lot. With Joel and Oden in early foul trouble, he would have played a significant amount of time... Frye would not have touched the floor and Lee could man the 5 spot whenever Bynum wasn't in the game. I have nothing against David Lee. I'd like for us to acquire him. I don't want to give up a huge chunk of the future for him, though, and that's what I believe Bayless and a first rounder would be. Ed O.
I can't decide who I want dealt, Blake or Sergio...tonight they both stunk. Sergio is good in the open court but sucks at defense and shooting Blake is a good shooter but sucks at running a team and defense Goodness, we need a point guard!
so then is bayless not the PG? and the guy gets to the rim but can't seem to finish, what's up with that?