Should have traded Aldridge for harden

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Natebishop3, Nov 2, 2012.

  1. ponderguy

    ponderguy Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2013
    Messages:
    789
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I never said I wanted to trade him, just that I think it is a pretty fair deal. My response was to this:
    Remember when some of you guys were fine with trading Aldridge for Lee, Barnes and Klay? Or how about the Monroe, stucky and first rounder?

    I agree about the Monroe deal being really bad now but Klay and Barnes are still very good and developing players who would fit in with this team really well and would really bolster our bench with a ton of talent. Lee while not spectacular would be a nice offensive and rebounding big. If we HAD to trade LMA that would be one of the deals I'd prefer
     
  2. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    92,774
    Likes Received:
    55,413
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    This. The Golden State trade was the only one that was rumored and actually didn't sound horrible.
     
  3. Strenuus

    Strenuus Global Moderator Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    50,077
    Likes Received:
    35,346
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think what KS is getting at is Okay, Lee is a nice offensive and rebounding big... but LMA is doing that BETTER, so we would lose there. Klay would be a redundancy of Batum, who we get MORE out of with the assists and rebounds and overall better stats, where Klay is just a shooter primarily. With Barnes... he's good, but with this trade we would already be behind and Barnes doesn't cover that slack.
     
  4. blue9

    blue9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Messages:
    10,729
    Likes Received:
    7,169
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I dunno - Barnes and Klay replacing Mo and Wright would give us one potent bench, and would likely make up for the drop-off from LMA to Lee. Our bench could probably average >35ppg depending on how many minutes Barnes/Klay got.
     
  5. Strenuus

    Strenuus Global Moderator Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    50,077
    Likes Received:
    35,346
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I see that, but whenever you're trading for a starter, I expect them to be starting for the team they are traded for unless age is a factor, which for Klay obviously isn't.
     
  6. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,276
    Likes Received:
    43,615
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Klay's more a redundancy of Matthews than anything else. Either way, with this deal, we would have been trying to find minutes for Thompson, Matthews, Barnes, and Batum, which simply wouldn't have worked. Also, we wouldn't have had enough cap-space to be able to trade for both Robinson AND Lopez (Lee/Klay/HFB make 4.3M more than LMA), so we wouldn't have picked up Lopez (especially since we wouldn't have been trying to placate an unhappy Aldridge), so that would have been another major effect.

    Hindsight 20/20, we're very fortunate this never happened.
     
    Strenuus likes this.
  7. Strenuus

    Strenuus Global Moderator Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    50,077
    Likes Received:
    35,346
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well said! Repped.
     
  8. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    92,774
    Likes Received:
    55,413
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    If we had made the trade, I would have looked to move Batum to Detroit for Monroe.

    Dame
    Thompson
    Barnes
    Monroe
    Lopez

    It is arguable whether our current starting five would be better long term than that starting five.
     
  9. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    And remember, the forum asked for Klay and Barnes with Lee. The rumor was only klay or Barnes with Lee, so realistically the rumor was even less if a value.
     
  10. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    92,774
    Likes Received:
    55,413
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    This is true. I think most of us rejected the idea of JUST Klay and Lee, or Barnes and Lee.
     
  11. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    Everything is arguable.
     
  12. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    92,774
    Likes Received:
    55,413
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Especially when we're talking long term :devilwink:
     
  13. ponderguy

    ponderguy Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2013
    Messages:
    789
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    18
    We'd have to go small ball some of the time, Barnes is really good in that role. I think GS should be going with Curry-Klay-Iggy-Barnes-Bogut as their starting 5. If we think we have good shooting now just imagine a lineup of Dame,Wes or Klay, Batum and Barnes with Lopez and Lee splitting time at C.
     
  14. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    It would suck, just like Golden State is sucking now
     
  15. ponderguy

    ponderguy Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2013
    Messages:
    789
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I guarantee we will have a stretch where we go around 13-10. Just because they didn't have a hot start like we did doesn't mean they aren't a good team. If you go through their schedule most of their losses are against really good teams
     
  16. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Wanna wager that Portland will have a stretch of 13-10? I am 100% certain that will never happen.
     
  17. ponderguy

    ponderguy Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2013
    Messages:
    789
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I'm game. what's the wager?
     
  18. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    You must post on your signature that the other poster is a magical genius all summer.
     
  19. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    92,774
    Likes Received:
    55,413
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    That's weak Mags! Come up with something good.
     
  20. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Give me some ideas
     

Share This Page