<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (pegs @ Feb 21 2008, 03:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>It's possible there were trades...and we just didn't hear about 'em yet.</div> bingo so nothing is over w/ yet atleast until late tonight.
Here is a trade that would be nice to make <u>Nets get:</u> Delonte West Damien Wilkins <u>Sonics get:</u> Jamal Mgloire Darrel Armstorng I tried it out on trade machine and it worked, that would be a nice deal for us
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (chris86 @ Feb 21 2008, 03:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Here is a trade that would be nice to make <u>Nets get:</u> Delonte West Damien Wilkins <u>Sonics get:</u> Jamal Mgloire Darrel Armstorng I tried it out on trade machine and it worked, that would be a nice deal for us</div> I'd want Wilcox before any of those
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (chris86 @ Feb 21 2008, 03:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Here is a trade that would be nice to make <u>Nets get:</u> Delonte West Damien Wilkins <u>Sonics get:</u> Jamal Mgloire Darrel Armstorng I tried it out on trade machine and it worked, that would be a nice deal for us</div> I'd take that. Looks like a pretty good trade to me. Plus, Frank would be able to play that 2 PG lineup he loves so much.
Why would we need Wilcox! We have 6 big men in Swift, Sean Williams, Boone, Diop, Mgloire, and Krstic. He would just make it even more confusing our big man situation. With the trade I posted this is what the rotation could look like: Harris/Williams Carter/West/Ager Jefferson/Nachbar/Hassell/Wilkins Krstic/Williams/Swift Boone/Diop/ Not a bad rotation and it kind of clears some logjams up at some positions. Boki can always play the 4 against smaller lineups that like to run.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (uptown4784 @ Feb 21 2008, 10:23 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>At least Magloire still hasnt request a trade unlike Kidd. He shows up at the game dont come up with excuses like KIdd</div> Like I said, he's been, by today's standards, extremely professional. But he didn't travel with the team to Toronto, hasn't cheered from the bench even after nights like last night. So I just think we'd be doing him and us a favor by moving him.
Ugh, there was interest in Magloire and they couldn't figure something out for Herrmann, who's just sitting there? I've never really understood how this works- can't you bundle a pick with a guy to make up a salary difference?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (lukewarmplay @ Feb 21 2008, 06:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Ugh, there was interest in Magloire and they couldn't figure something out for Herrmann, who's just sitting there? I've never really understood how this works- can't you bundle a pick with a guy to make up a salary difference?</div> Pistons wanted to dump Murray so the Nets could've taken him and Herrman and cut Murray or someone else like KVH. Either the Pistons really didn't want Magloire that bad or they preferred to keep Herrman.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (lukewarmplay @ Feb 21 2008, 06:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Ugh, there was interest in Magloire and they couldn't figure something out for Herrmann, who's just sitting there? I've never really understood how this works- can't you bundle a pick with a guy to make up a salary difference?</div> future picks have no monetary value. . . . I really expected Boki to be gone and totally complete the new attention to defense. Magloire . . . .what a waste of $4 million.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Dumpy @ Feb 21 2008, 06:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (lukewarmplay @ Feb 21 2008, 06:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Ugh, there was interest in Magloire and they couldn't figure something out for Herrmann, who's just sitting there? I've never really understood how this works- can't you bundle a pick with a guy to make up a salary difference?</div> future picks have no monetary value. . . . I really expected Boki to be gone and totally complete the new attention to defense. Magloire . . . .what a waste of $4 million. </div> Wait, but you can trade a salary for a pick. Can you not do it if there's a player with a different salary involved?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (lukewarmplay @ Feb 21 2008, 06:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Dumpy @ Feb 21 2008, 06:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (lukewarmplay @ Feb 21 2008, 06:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Ugh, there was interest in Magloire and they couldn't figure something out for Herrmann, who's just sitting there? I've never really understood how this works- can't you bundle a pick with a guy to make up a salary difference?</div> future picks have no monetary value. . . . I really expected Boki to be gone and totally complete the new attention to defense. Magloire . . . .what a waste of $4 million. </div> Wait, but you can trade a salary for a pick. Can you not do it if there's a player with a different salary involved? </div> someone should correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that there has to be a trade exception involved or the team receiving the player has to be below the cap.
