The reviewed out of bounds call in 4th Qtr

DaRizzle · Apr 23, 2011

Im not here to hate....that game was awesome and loved every minute of that amazing 4th quarter....Brandon motherfucking Roy

BUT.....

There is no way that call should have been overturned....it was suck a clusterfuck of hands at the top that it was impossible to see who touched it at the top last. Then when the ball is coming down it looks like Crash could have swung down and touched the ball again but inconclusive because of a bad camera angle.

The ball was the Mavs before the review it should have stayed with the Mavs. If they had first called it POR ball then it should have stayed with POR.

Roy was on such a role IMO the Blazers would have still overcome it....but that was a bullshit reversal of the call

Not hating, just sayin

ILOVEODEN · Apr 23, 2011

100% AGREE THE MAGIC OF DAVID STERN LOL

BrianFromWA · Apr 23, 2011

They stayed on the overhead one awhile, which seemed to show Chandler's hand on top of the ball slapping downward.

But I semi-agree, I thought best-case scenario is a Crash/Chandler tossup.

I'm NEVER one to put my faith in Steve Javie making an impartial call.

PapaG · Apr 23, 2011

I clearly saw Chandler's fingernail on the ball last before it went out of bounds.

Get some glasses!!!

B-Roy · Apr 23, 2011

They could have called a jump ball.

Sinobas · Apr 23, 2011

Portland has been screwed by the refs so many times, that I HOPE Gerald touched the ball last. Blazers need to win one of those one time!

PapaG · Apr 23, 2011

Chandler should have already fouled out of the game, so it doesn't really matter.

Darkwebs · Apr 23, 2011

Maybe we lucked out with this call. But the refs must've saw something to overturn it. Maybe they had an angle that the viewers didn't.

Darkwebs · Apr 23, 2011

Sinobas said:
Portland has been screwed by the refs so many times, that I HOPE Gerald touched the ball last. Blazers need to win one of those one time!

LOL.

DaRizzle · Apr 23, 2011

B-Roy said:
They could have called a jump ball.

Are you sure about that? I thought that was only an option when the refs were totally clueless to what happened and dont even make an initial call...Once a call has been made having a jump ball is no longer an option, just overturning the initial call

Or am I wrong?

(I just looked at my sig, I cant be)

3RA1N1AC · Apr 23, 2011

im pretty sure the clock stops for a foul, but i might be wrong

DaRizzle · Apr 23, 2011

3RA1N1AC said:
im pretty sure the clock stops for a foul, but i might be wrong

So you are the one who said that....I knew it was comin from someone...sigh

maxiep · Apr 23, 2011

B-Roy said:
They could have called a jump ball.

That was my thought as well.

3RA1N1AC · Apr 23, 2011

hahahahahaha

STOMP · Apr 23, 2011

Wallace had inside position with both hands on the ball trying to secure it, Chandler (from behind) had one slapping down on it. Calls for this sort of tie scenario typically go against the player who is poking the ball away

they want 7 games

STOMP

3RA1N1AC · Apr 23, 2011

STOMP said:
Wallace had inside position with both hands on the ball trying to secure it, Chandler (from behind) had one slapping down on it. Calls in the NBA for this sort of tie scenario typically go against the player who is poking the ball away

they want 7 games

STOMP

blazers in 6

Paxil · Apr 23, 2011

I was very surprised at that call.

TripTango · Apr 23, 2011

Chandler basically volleyball spiked the thing out of Wallace's hands -- I don't see a problem with the call.

BBert · Apr 23, 2011

TripTango said:
Chandler basically volleyball spiked the thing out of Wallace's hands -- I don't see a problem with the call.

This. I'm sure there will be no convincing any Mavs fan of this, but to me it was clear that although Wallace got his hand on the ball, it was Chandler who knocked it out of bounds. It's always called like that. Always.

THE HCP · Apr 23, 2011

I had 9 different angles to look at super-slo mo. I honestly couldn't tell one way or the other. Would have been cool with the refs decision either way.

Sug · Apr 23, 2011

BBert said:
This. I'm sure there will be no convincing any Mavs fan of this, but to me it was clear that although Wallace got his hand on the ball, it was Chandler who knocked it out of bounds. It's always called like that. Always.

Exactly because basically the refs don't call the foul and award possession. Personally I would have been fine with a foul call on Chandler.

Sug · Apr 23, 2011

HCP said:
I had 9 different angles to look at super-slo mo. I honestly couldn't tell one way or the other. Would have been cool with the refs decision either way.

Did you hear anything about Mark Cuban walking out with 39 seconds left?

THE HCP · Apr 23, 2011

I did hear that, but was so god damned busy down the stretch, didn't have time to look for him.

mook · Apr 23, 2011

I thought there were a couple of pretty questionable calls. That last foul on Chandler was blatantly bad. If I were a Dallas fan I'd be pretty torn between being pissed off at the refs, and being pissed off at my gutless team that inevitably snatches defeat from the jaws of victory like the bastard love child of Britney Spears and George Costanza.

As a Blazer fan I'll play along with the game and just think about the pure awesome legend of Brandon Roy.

Tonight he guaranteed he'd have his jersey retired.

DaRizzle · Apr 23, 2011

nobody had clear control of the ball at the top, nobody knocked it out of nobody's hands...and now saying you would have been fine with a foul on Chandler...sarcasm?

DaRizzle · Apr 23, 2011

mook said:
I thought there were a couple of pretty questionable calls. That last foul on Chandler was blatantly bad. If I were a Dallas fan I'd be pretty torn between being pissed off at the refs, and being pissed off at my gutless team that inevitably snatches defeat from the jaws of victory like the bastard love child of Britney Spears and George Costanza.

Oh yeah! forgot about that BS...Congrats Chandler, you just stole the ball and are gonna get 2 points...whats your prize...a foul?!? One of the biggest phantom calls Ive seen in a while (that i can recall)

TripTango · Apr 23, 2011

DaRizzle said:
nobody had clear control of the ball at the top, nobody knocked it out of nobody's hands...and now saying you would have been fine with a foul on Chandler...sarcasm?

Are you serious? The ball suddenly starts moving in the same direction as Chandler's flailing hand, right at the time that hand and ball connect -- how do you explain that? Magnets?

TripTango · Apr 23, 2011

DaRizzle said:
Oh yeah! forgot about that BS...Congrats Chandler, you just stole the ball and are gonna get 2 points...whats your prize...a foul?!? One of the biggest phantom calls Ive seen in a while (that i can recall)

This one I will concede, with an asterisk that says "* see game 1".

TehChad · Apr 23, 2011

Yeah, I agree it was a bad call...but on the other hand, they happen every game. Welcome to the NBA

BBert · Apr 23, 2011

mook said:
I thought there were a couple of pretty questionable calls. That last foul on Chandler was blatantly bad.

I figured it was a make-up call for that terrible call on Batum. If it wasn't it should have been.

The reviewed out of bounds call in 4th Qtr

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

BLAKER

Truth Speaker

Editor in Chief

Banned User

If it takes months

Banned User

Banned User

Awakened to emptiness

Awakened to emptiness

BLAKER

00110110 00111001

BLAKER

RIP Dr. Jack

00110110 00111001

mere fan

00110110 00111001

Active Member

Quick First Step

Weasels Ripped My Flesh

NorthEastPortland'sFinest

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

NorthEastPortland'sFinest

The 2018-19 season was the best I've seen

BLAKER

BLAKER

Quick First Step

Quick First Step

Teh Great NEGATOR

Weasels Ripped My Flesh

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread