Nope. You didn't see last game? CJ was on the bench with Dame and Stotts used a Napier-Pat-ET-Noah-Ed lineup which built our lead in the second quarter. He then brought CJ back in with Dame.
Which is why I said I'm curious to see if it lasts.
What I liked about that lineup was that there wasn't a ball dominate "star" on the court so they weren't standing around watching and waiting for someone else to do something, they functioned as a team, the ball movement was good, players were hustling, playing defense, it worked. I hope to see more of Shabazz off the bench and Biggie, however Stotts decides to use him. I also like that Stotts shook up the lineup in general, if for nothing else to remind everyone who's in charge.
No, not at all. But one can always hope that minor tweaks lead to continued improvement.
ME? When do you see me ever blast this team or get all worked up either good or bad on here? I was commenting on this place. We lose and peeps want people fired and traded, we win they are on their way to the HOF.
Right? And if we had lost to the Nuggets we were bound for the lottery. I think 90% of this joint live on the extremes. Definitely not me.
you mean live in mom's basement
The joke sailed over your head. But the premise was that while you constantly rail on posters for being extreme in their commentary on the team and its players, you are simultaneously extreme in your comments about the forum and its posters.
Ah it was a joke, gotcha. But you think I'm wrong that the majority on here are as bi-polar as they get? From winning the championship to finishing dead last in 24 hours. I don't think I'm too off base with that
Yes, I think you're wrong about that. You take a few people who behave in a certain way and extrapolate it across the majority. It's a lazy opinion, but I'm used to it at this point.
