<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Pacers fan forever @ May 1 2007, 03:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>to be a great president</div> I just don't understand why you feel that way. The Presidency is so overrated, Obama will only be considered effective if he continuef to have a Democratic house/senate.
We still got that bet going on BCB?If Fred Thompson declares and wins the primary, I get to pick your sig/avatarVice versa? Things are looking nice for me..
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Dominator @ May 1 2007, 04:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>We still got that bet going on BCB?If Fred Thompson declares and wins the primary, I get to pick your sig/avatarVice versa? Things are looking nice for me..</div> Your right. :no1:
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BrewCityBuck @ May 1 2007, 04:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Your right. :no1:</div>Sarcasm?Not?A little of both?Explain Mr. Spock.
I watched Fred Thompson on Hannity & Colmes last night, he looked half dead and like he wouldn't last through a campaign, not to mention he's old/fat/boring to listen to. What a terrible bunch of candidates the Republicans have this time...yikes... You have a socially liberal womenizing whisper who has lived off 9/11, another old womanizer in Gingrich, A mormon flipflopper who is dying in the polls....it's like the Republicans have given up knowing the country wants a change to the Democratic side.
I have to disagree. I find him very interesting to listen to. He has that certain tone that guys like Ernie Harwell, Paul Harvey, Ronald Regan has/had. It's not a big, booming voice, but rather a voice of wisdom, like a grandfather. He is easy to understand and keeps it to the point. No rambling on about nothing.Old? Who cares. Fat? Again, who cares.I am kind of worried he couldn't take the physical aspect of a campaign, and that's something he's still taking careful consideration with.
LOL, I'm loving mike Gavell."I'm scared of these people!" - Mike Gavell"right on guy we've never seen or heard of before. Gavell is a former senator, and by former I mean he left the senate in 1981, to give you context, I was your age back then. But Gavell has a strong background, Graduating along with other Alaskan Senators from "Wild Coot school of diplomacy and prospectin'" - John Stewart
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Dominator @ May 2 2007, 02:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I have to disagree. I find him very interesting to listen to. He has that certain tone that guys like Ernie Harwell, Paul Harvey, Ronald Regan has/had. It's not a big, booming voice, but rather a voice of wisdom, like a grandfather. He is easy to understand and keeps it to the point. No rambling on about nothing.Old? Who cares. Fat? Again, who cares.I am kind of worried he couldn't take the physical aspect of a campaign, and that's something he's still taking careful consideration with.</div>I'm also concerned he couldn't take the actually declaring to run part of the campaign either.....
Mike Gavell is pretty funny...in the debates.... "When I first got into the Senate, I thought, how the hell did I get here? Then after a frew months I wondered, how and the hell did these guys get here?"
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Something-To-Say @ May 1 2007, 02:48 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>You are one confused dude. You have an Albany avatar, a JaMarcus Russell sig, the Yankees record, and a Texas player(Aaron Ross). What the hell, man? Though you are one of my fav posters :happy0144:</div>lol the russell sig I made just because I liked the pic and I was half asleep when I did it...the albany avatar was a friend of mine who got drafted by philly, and the giants / yankees are my favorite football and baseball teams. lol.
I haven't been following the election entirely lately.Who do you guys say at this point would be the best candidates for each party in the public eye?Maybe there's some numbers?BCB probably knows
The top 3 candidates on each side IN MY OWN OPINIONDemocrats-1. Barack Obama2. Bill Richardson3. Mike Gravel Republicans-1. Fred Thompson2. Mitt Romney3. John McCainThe rest of the U.S-1. Hilary Clinton2. Barack Obama3. John Edwards1. Rudy Guliani2. John McCain3. Fred Thompson
I agree with Rudy G being the favorite republican in the public's eye, but not really the best true republican. You can interchange Obama/Hillary because they are so close. General America still doesn't know much about Thompson.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BrewCityBuck @ May 2 2007, 06:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I agree with Rudy G being the favorite republican in the public's eye, but not really the best true republican. You can interchange Obama/Hillary because they are so close. General America still doesn't know much about Thompson.</div>I'm just looking at the polls.It's always Rudy/McCain and then it's almost a tie bet. Romney and Thompson. Since I am a Thompson homer, well, you can figure it out.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Dominator @ May 2 2007, 04:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I'm just looking at the polls.</div>And he's getting 8-17% in most credible recent polls. Among the weakest candidates the repubs have fielded in a long time that is not good.
... And your point is?He's in third place mostly. In some he's in 2nd, in some he's in fourth. I listed the top 3 candidates.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Dominator @ May 2 2007, 04:34 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>... And your point is?He's in third place mostly. In some he's in 2nd, in some he's in fourth. I listed the top 3 candidates.</div>my point is that he's still not looking good in terms of electability.
