OT "I'm Dealing With A Few Transgender Issues"

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by ABM, Jun 29, 2021.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. tlongII

    tlongII Legendary Poster

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    17,098
    Likes Received:
    11,716
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Systems Analyst
    Location:
    Beaverton, Oregon
    SlyPokerDog likes this.
  2. Kano John

    Kano John Start 'em young!

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2020
    Messages:
    788
    Likes Received:
    1,220
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Portland
    I don't really have a dog in this fight but I am curious where you came up with the 99.98%
     
  3. Phatguysrule

    Phatguysrule Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,525
    Likes Received:
    16,549
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The NIH link says 1 in 5000 (0.02%) infants have Ambiguous Genitalia. So half of those could be girls.

    So really it would put 99.99% in the accurate division based on that criteria.
     
    Kano John likes this.
  4. Kano John

    Kano John Start 'em young!

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2020
    Messages:
    788
    Likes Received:
    1,220
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Portland
    I don't know this for sure but I would venture to guess that if you talked to a transgender person they would tell you that there is more to their decision to transition than genitalia.
     
  5. Phatguysrule

    Phatguysrule Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,525
    Likes Received:
    16,549
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sports classifications shouldn't consider an individual person's decisions. There is no way to do so effectively.

    Assignment at birth is the most fair, accurate, consistent, and least invasive way to determine who should be allowed to compete in women's only divisions.

    If somebody can propose something else that is less invasive and more than 99.99% accurate I'd probably support that instead.
     
    Last edited: May 22, 2024
  6. crandc

    crandc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    21,464
    Likes Received:
    27,624
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I am aware of the concerns of cis women. But there are outliers in sports and other fields. Brittney Griner gave her high school team a huge advantage. Should she have been banned? She's taller than most men. Was it unfair? Yes, actually. In life there are advantages. Like being straight and cis. White and male.

    No one has found a man who wakes up one morning and says I think I will become a woman and win a gold medal. People who their whole lives have been demonized and rejected. Abused, thrown out of their homes, assaulted. Are they doing all this just to win a game?

    School boards and state legislatures devote sessions to banning trans people from sports, criminalizing health care, saying their existence harms children and making it a crime to simply use a restroom.

    All that to win a race?
    And the solution is to segregate trans people as unfit toi mingle with "real" people?
     
    Chris Craig and RR7 like this.
  7. Phatguysrule

    Phatguysrule Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,525
    Likes Received:
    16,549
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think I understand what you're saying. I'm curious though... What solution would you like to see?
     
    Last edited: May 22, 2024
  8. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,035
    Likes Received:
    24,902
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    Well, if everyone can't come to a common understanding on this, I'm afraid I'll have no choice but to cancel all sporting events at all levels so as to restore order.

    And if you can't agree about who uses what restroom, I'm going to eliminate restrooms.

    Not bluffing here.

    barfo
     
    Chris Craig likes this.
  9. crandc

    crandc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    21,464
    Likes Received:
    27,624
    Trophy Points:
    113
    As far as trans people go, if they can begin transition earlier it's much less of an issue. But IMHO many people, not accusing anyone here, mean politicians, don't want solutions, they want someone they can use to whip up moral panic.

    Don't know about anyone else but I have never peeked into restroom stalls to verify the genitalia of the person urinating next to me.
     
    Chris Craig and Phatguysrule like this.
  10. Phatguysrule

    Phatguysrule Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,525
    Likes Received:
    16,549
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Agreed. The restroom complaints are insane. I actually do like the solution of just making more individual restrooms anyway. I like the privacy.

    I also agree that most politicians only care about most of these issues to rile up their base.

    I don't want anybody targeted, but I don't know if there is any agreeable way to allow people who have transitioned from biological male to compete against women without making women's sports less enjoyable for all.

    But absolutely, everyone should be allowed to compete if they have the ability. And every child should be able to play youth sports for sure. Regardless of ability.

    But there obviously needs to be a line between the women's divisions and men's. I simply can't think of a more fair one. And I've tried. We've discussed it in this thread and I found that my proposal at the time was far more invasive than current physicals, and as such would not be appropriate. So I've adjusted my position with that in mind. I'm open to adjusting my position again.

    I'd love to hear of alternate proposals that could maybe be more appealing. And that's not a challenge to anyone in here. Just an honest invitation to anyone who may have a better idea.

    I'm interested in the discussion because I've coached girls for nearly a decade and have 3 daughters who are athletes. I've had many discussions with concerned parents, coaches, and players. I'd love to have an agreeable solution to talk to them about.
     
    Last edited: May 22, 2024
    Hoopguru likes this.
  11. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,275
    Likes Received:
    43,614
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, actually. Not unfair at all. Advantages are not unfairness, as long as the same rules and criteria apply to everyone.

    Of course not, and the implication by some that that is the intention is silly. However, just because someone's gender identity isn't fraudulent doesn't justify that person competing in a division that exists specifically to accommodate the undeniable physical difference been those AMAB and AFAB.


    No. The solution is to have anyone--cis or trans--who was either born a boy or identifies a boy compete in one division, and protect athletic opportunities for cis-girls by allowing them to compete only against people with the same basic physiology, as was always intended by Title IX.
     
  12. crandc

    crandc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    21,464
    Likes Received:
    27,624
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Which amounts to a de facto ban on trans people in sports.
     
  13. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,275
    Likes Received:
    43,614
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Only if you believe that trans-girls are inherently physically inferior to their cis AMAB counterparts. That seems like a very prejudiced position.

    It amounts to trans people participating in sports at the level their ability permits, as meritocracy dictates. If they're good enough, they will participate. The trans-girl from @kjironman1's post would still have been the second-fastest 200m runner at her school competing in the open division.

    To clarify--my position would be that trans-boys who have not undergone any hormonal transition treatments should still be able to compete in the AFAB division if they so desire; it would only be those who have begun taking testosterone (such as the Texas state champion trans wrestler from 2018) who would be restricted to the open division (as he in fact wanted).

    This solution is clear, consistent, and the most physiological fair way to protect girls sports and give everyone the opportunity to compete.
     
    Phatguysrule likes this.
  14. crandc

    crandc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    21,464
    Likes Received:
    27,624
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm sorry but a bit confused. Seems earlier you said only compete as gender assigned at birth but now it seems you favor separate league for trans people?
     
  15. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,275
    Likes Received:
    43,614
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't know where you're getting that. I've been very clear on two and only two divisions.
    • Girls (AFAB) division: AFAB, no transition hormones.
    • Open division: AMAB, AFAB-transitioning. Inclusive of anyone and everyone not eligible to compete in the girls division
    I have never suggested a separate league for trans people.
     
    Phatguysrule and riverman like this.
  16. Chris Craig

    Chris Craig (Blazersland) I'm Your Huckleberry Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    58,575
    Likes Received:
    58,883
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Trans people are going to be targeted. There is no amenable avenue here. Trans girls identify as girls. They want to compete against other girls akin to their identity. I'm not sure there is as much push back against trans boys because there is not a perceived advantage.

    Parents of cis girl athletes and others in support of them don't want trans girls competing against them because of disadvantage.

    The two solutions we hear are trans girls compete against boys because they were born male or to create a different "open" division for trans athletes. Either way this demeans the identity of trans athletes or segregates them. Can we really expect trans athletes to be open to that?
     
    Phatguysrule likes this.
  17. Chris Craig

    Chris Craig (Blazersland) I'm Your Huckleberry Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    58,575
    Likes Received:
    58,883
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's not about them being inferior to cis males. I don't believe that is what she is getting at. It's that they identify as females and want to compete with those they are akin to according to that identification. Segregating them or denying their identity would be in affect a de facto ban.

    A trans boy would not want to compete in a girls division. They identify as male.

    I get wanting to protect athletic opportunities for cis girls. I also get that Trans girls have more at stake than medals or scholarships. They have their identities at stake. What a complex situation.
     
  18. Chris Craig

    Chris Craig (Blazersland) I'm Your Huckleberry Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    58,575
    Likes Received:
    58,883
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Rather a different division? Or just having trans gendered athletes compete in the men's division. You suggest that those born women can still compete against women as long as they have not undergone transition hormones. Though you have no problem with cis boys competing against men, even having undergone transition hormones because they probably won't win anyway? What if they start winning? Beating cis men? How does that play out?
     
  19. Phatguysrule

    Phatguysrule Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,525
    Likes Received:
    16,549
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So what is the process you would recommend to more accurately delineate between the women's division and the men's (open) division?

    Making a 3rd division isn't an option, IMO. That's just a cruel way to target trans athletes.
     
  20. Phatguysrule

    Phatguysrule Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,525
    Likes Received:
    16,549
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I would even say the open division should be open to those who are eligible to compete in the women's division. If say, Brittney Griner wants to compete at a higher level, why not allow it? She doesn't have an unfair competitive advantage.
     
    PtldPlatypus likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page