No, you send out your best player for Ingram. You take a chance on Zion because we can afford to do that.
I think the most humorous part of all this is that people wanting us to deal the pick for a championship run know this organization hasn't had such a...
But we should especially with a Dame trade. No superstar coming backbit enough assets to move us along at a better rate than the current road we are...
I don't feel that way if we actually draft. I think it is Miller or Scoot and if the one we pick doesn't work out it isn't a gaf like the Paul draft....
I worry we will throw away the future for a feeble 2 year run at something unattainable with whatever they can put on the floor.
And that is exactly why I think NO would trade him. He is becoming their anchor and not in a good way. Taking up salary and hurt more than Nurk. I...
He is a center? I guess I don't follow that. I thought he trained or rehabbed in Portland? I can't see NO wanting to keep a guy that is a serious...
Not sure if this has been brought up, but how about a retool while keeping the 3rd pick? A crazy retool for me would be a risky move but we are...
Exactly and I don't see that happening. He is a team guy to a certain point. He didn't take less to help nor did he have to. He won't give up the...
Sharpe showed he could go to the next level without the likes of Lillard and and Ant on the floor. Playing the role of 3rd seat is much different and...
This is the biggest truth and why I advocate for trading him at this point. Great talent, not easy to build around due to his need of always having...
But if you are trading #3 for vet help to go for it, it would only make sense you trade Sharpe for the same reason. Why trade one prospect for vet...
Keep the pick and blow up the rest. Lillard, Nurk, Ant gone. If you trade the pick, you probably also trade Sharpe (vets wanted for Lillard). Then...
#3 to me means we trade it for a vet to keep Lillard happy. Any player for the #3 will help, but not make us a top contender. This is unfortunate...
Off topic but loved this from back in the day. [MEDIA]
Lucas Clyde Roy Sabonis Bates 56 That was harder than I thought.
I still believe any non-Lillard trades would be just treading water. Time to retool.
You could be 100% right on that. I have seen the 3 I mentioned and not the others so I can't speak to them. I know Scoot is suppose to be something...
If you didn't want to start over. [ATTACH]
Great question asked. I personally think after #4. #1 is a given. For me #2 would be Miller and I would be hard pressed to trade that. #3 is 50/50...
Separate names with a comma.
