Dude you sound crazier than theists on this topic. That's not easy to do.
Denny if you're trying to pick a fight with the Cosmological Argument it is based on the philosophical concept of nothing existing, not on empty...
I don't believe love as it refers to the human emotion is vague. However when you say "God is full of love" or whatever, that's getting into...
Green is not vague. It's a word we use for the specific visual sensation humans experience when they observe a certain wavelength of light. "Good"...
define benevolent without using the word good... I always wonder what theists mean by God is good. It's such a vague, anthropecentric thing to say.
define good. skilled? beneficial? well-behaved?
someone move the base of the basket back to the baseline
At least they would be open to more convincing justification for apparent moral contradictions than theists can possibly offer now. I...
In my experience theists tend to anthropomorphize the concept of God way more than atheists do. Atheists do think the apparent contradiction of a...
You're making a semantic error here. Theism/atheism describes belief or lack of belief in God, not if there is an afterlife or not. An atheist can...
It would be the same type of purely emotional experience for most, although most would be converting to the religion of their particular culture or...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcSENNsIfIs
I'm not an unbeliever, I'm Dognostic.
I don't know. I don't even know if that's a meaningful question.
You're still missing the point, which is just a statistical argument - not really concerned with theology at the moment. If humans have any...
some do, probably not most.
Yes, but you missed the point. If it's effectively impossible for a human to choose not to sin, humans do not actually have free will in the matter.
no it's a logical deduction that a morally consistent God would not command genocide (etc.) this is a different subject, but worth contemplating...
Because the implication is if (a perfect, morally consistent) God actually existed events would have been different than described.
It's more of a psychological analysis. Point is they are reacting to the actions ascribed to God in the OT based on their moral perceptions, not...
Separate names with a comma.
