Where did you get this new 10^150 number? And where did the moles come from?
You are showing that your numbers are for structures that are many, many times more complex than those believed to be the first form of life. You are...
Ah -- so what is the final number? What are the odds for building some type of self-replicating protein? Not an organism, not a human, not a 747......
No, you still aren't seeing the problem. The odds you are citing are for the random formation of something that was never believed to form randomly!...
Mags, take some time and examine this excellent summary of these statistical flaws. Literally every single one of the numbers you cited are...
How about we stop using junk statistics based on events that aren't even believed by evolutionary biologists? Do you see what ALL of those numbers...
You are mixing up two different uses of the Boeing 747 metaphor. Almost completely unrelated.
And then some.
Huh? Who brought Dawkins to the party?
That's not how these things are done. Publishing a paper in one area does not imply authority in another. Hell, it doesn't imply authority at all,...
Huh -- turns out Fred Hoyle has a whole FALLACY named after the faulty assumptions he made in calculating that 1/10^40,000 figure... Impressive!...
I'm still waiting for the scientific journals... Did I miss a link?
Yup. That's the only uniting view, in fact. Where do you get the "and we've got proof" addendum? Was that in the fine print of my membership...
No -- YOU are missing the point here. The odds of laying out SOME order, WHATEVER that may be, is 100%. And whatever order that turns out to be is...
Something you repeatedly fail to understand is that there is no church of atheism. There is no gospel of godlessness. There is no version of an...
Nobody is saying it doesn't matter. The honest response to a mystery is "I don't know, so I shouldn't make any big assumptions." If you want to...
It DOES apply. If your input numbers or methods are not sound, it doesn't matter how many significant digits you round your results to.
Damn. Wrote a long response, and Tapatalk crashed. Here goes again. The snow flake image isn't a theory, it is an analogy. By your completely...
I read the post earlier Mags. The math is not the problem -- it's your (or whomever's) justification that is faulty. You are multiplying estimated...
1) In the OBSERVABLE universe. You are aware that nobody has ever seen an edge, right? 2) But let's assume for the moment that what we see is all we...
Separate names with a comma.
