Any stat that puts the Blazers in front of the Lakers is pretty worthless wouldn't you say?
Link?
Great, a useless formula. Lebron James is the best player in the league? NO WAY!!!!!
If it doesn't prove anything what's it's point? In this case, if it's not perfect it's no more useful than opinion.
WTF? No I don't. I don't have to do anything. I am not arguing 2+2 = 4. This is a formula who's inventor doesn't even back 100%. Why should I?
What? I have no idea if you like him or not. I'm only talking about the subject at hand. This article. A little advice. When you read an article...
Why do I have to provide something better? I think Journey sucks. I don't have to be better at drums, bass, guitar and singing to come that that...
No, Kevin Pritchard made it up. He Loves attention and credit you know. What's the information? Where are the details?
Calling something worthless is not a worthless endevor.
Oh alright..... Get your feet of the couch for fucks sake.
I think KP is a god? That's interesting. This is not conventional wisdom. This is one article by Pete V, and a pretty bad at that. You're the one...
That's what I thought. Run along now.
Conventional wisdom that was never uttered by anyone until to day? Here's your cracker.
How did they get home court?
OK.
I do understand power rankings. They are worthless. Just like PER. I can tell you the Lakers are playing badly right now, and I don't need John...
That's some formula. Would you like to bet $250 on the Blazers Lakers series? I'm going with Los Angleles.
Problems With PER PER largely measures offensive performance. Hollinger freely admits that two of the defensive statistics it incorporates --...
Perfect! Would you like to bet $250 on the Lakers v Blazers series with me? I'll take LA.
http://scorecenter.espn.go.com/nba/standings
Separate names with a comma.
