i know he's an RFA and we can match whatever he gets offered, but what im saying again, is IF he was offered 2 contracts with everything else being...
i guess what im trying to say is that if meyers had 2 contracts, identical one here and one elsewhere, but the elsewhere was a starting role, he'd be...
I'm a huge Ed Davis fan as most would know. I like both scenarios for him, he plays well either way. What I've thought about before though is that...
all this 100% of this. pack the bags, meyers.
rest the starters, empty the bench - let the kids play.
happy to see the starting 5 as it should be.
crabbe if it makes $ sense henderson to cover if it doesn't hark as he plays hard leonard, bet on himself, sucked 90% of the season, and now is out...
look bud, you know god damned well they are called swish3s....
i dont wish ill on anyone...... BUT im 100% not mad about this at all prolly should have taken that contract huh
link is now updated
updating the links....
Quicks whole career is a pump-fake into an airball....
Roy was something special, no doubt- but injuries really robbed us of all that he was on the way to being, which would have been something great imo....
No doubt im more of a traditional role guy. but if were really talking about stretch 4's and being fine with avg D, rebounds, blocks from the PF...
cause running dame into the ground every season is only going to work for so long.....
He's an unrestricted FA at the end of the season. I understand also the guys listed are being called 'PF's but cmon now.... I don't want a stretch...
I dunno if im sold on any of them TBH We need to sort out the starting lineup. Getting a SF would just complicate things even more, we have enough...
pretty much this.
in response to the OP, probably. The way we're bringing Vonleh along, ie starting against premier plaers, playing fuck all other minutes, regularly...
depending on the game dynamic, it can be either Plum, Davis, Aminu, Crabbe or Henderson. TBH, that's a great 'problem' to have
Separate names with a comma.
