Everyone still good with elder abuse? Cool.
Perception. We need to move the vets and cut salary, trading them for lottery picks on rookie deals makes more sense than getting mid to late 1sts in...
There are different types of defense. It's questionable if Sarr can be a true anchor. Clingan will be that and he doesn't have the rebounding...
This might actually be a draft where we can move our veterans and cut salary while acquiring young, lottery-level talent in a devalued draft.
Ant or Grant would go a long way for them.
I don't think Sarr at #1 is a guarantee. Sarr very well might fall to #2 or #3.
If Atlanta plans to compete in the immediate then trading the pick or taking Clingan might make the most sense.
Revisionist history. Everyone was making fun of him after last year saying he didn't have a left hand. It's different when everyone on the floor is...
I think Ant would beat great spot for Houston. Van Fleet can be the third guard and Amen can be the guy who feeds Ant and Green.
Hearing from where? I hear Holland is dropping like a rock.
I honestly do too. I just hope they know what they're doing. Let's hope every team can't be wrong. I like the IDEA of Clingan.
I don't think the Blazers are giving up Clingan just to get extra considerations next year. Maybe for Sarr, but I don't think anyone else.
Not in this scenario. You should give it a watch.
Bill Simmons and Ryen Russillo think Clingan can totally go #1. Everyone can't be crazy I guess. I'm all for acquiring him or #3. Someone interesting...
If they do, let's hope they get it right.
Seems many think this. If the Blazers feel that way, I don't mind them moving up. Go after your guy.
Too many numbers for them. Boomers making this about interest rates and inflation when it isn't.
Improve? It's actively been making it worse. I would have settled for keeping it the same. It's more than just the billions to other countries while...
I'm definitely complicit to some degree, nobody said otherwise. The spectrum matters. It's not all the same, obviously. Let me know where you're...
I understand where you're coming from and I'm not even arguing against it. I think your mistake is making this Trump v Biden, when in reality this is...
Separate names with a comma.
