ALMIGHTY-YYYY!
I was trying to think if this post was addressed at me in some way, but then I realized that I’m never right.
Sam Amick was on a podcast with Bill Oram of the Oregonian and said that the Blazers could realistically have five first round picks to use in trades...
And yet you post here in this den of Blazers wackiness?
[ATTACH]
Hey, teams, here's a hot, steaming money pit turd. Enjoy!...
Good think I've moved. As have you, apparently. Frequently. ;)
How long is that in dog piles?
Now that you mention it, yes.
The way I see it, Cronin is at a fork in the road. Build around Dame with experienced, playoff-ready, vets, or do a full rebuild around the young...
That's a statement of fact which you misinterpreted as snark. The best the Blazers could reasonably get to in tanking is the 5th worst record. That...
There are a handful of us who migrated to BBB when ESPN shut down its forum. I don't know how many years exactly. Probably since '97 or so.
I understand that sentiment, but it comes at the expense of one of Dame's potential remaining playoff years. He already posted that there's "no way"...
And I just said that the math says you have a better chance of getting a later pick than a better one. Nothing I wrote could be interpreted as snark....
Of course. The current system is designed to give the worst teams decent picks, but not enough certainty that somewhat better teams will be...
The math is not your friend. The 5th spot will get you a 10.5% chance of getting the top pick, and around a 55% chance of picking 6-9.
I don't agree that they're light years away from where the Blazers are right now. It's been so long since the starters were healthy, I think people...
Hollinger has an article out today about how scouts are not excited about anybody in the draft outside of the top two. The only reason the Blazers...
I’m so embarrassed that the Blazers bench unit lost to the Kings’ full squad.
Yeah, but we’re the only fan base the Blazers have.
Separate names with a comma.
