fixed.
And these are the same economist who believed that "everything was fine" or saw no inherent danger in these risky loans and practices. Fuck them, all...
They should honor their commitment and agreement as it was drafted, not retroactively place measures to punish after the fact.
giving them the money in the first place is throwing it away.
oh...is that what it is. one of my buddies in seattle is doing that shit i guess.....jujitsu and MMA. kind of whatever, that whole culture bugs me....
Nope. They had the freedom to use that money as they saw fit, without restrictions as was the terms given to them. Also, per the terms of the money,...
They actually have an MMA gym chain out here in the OC.
Yes, if you want government to control businesses, say how much people earn, and to tell you what you need to do.
When you give money without restrictions...they are essentially that. Without restrictions.
No, not mad at AIG at all. If the government was stupid enough to give them money, caveat emptor. They had contracts as well as legal protection...
who won the street fight?
11-5
[IMG]
No thanks, I prefer not to dine at Taco Bell next to smelly homeless people. It ruins the experience.
wow, you had nice seats!
apparantly the village doesn't have a graphic designer.
http://www.dignityvillage.org/content/index.php?option=com_frontpage&Itemid=1
It was about 5-6 years ago..outside of portland, they wanted to ship the homeless there.
I agree. Nothing worth stealing from macs really.
oh yeah, there in the article...dignity village.
Separate names with a comma.
