And yet they traded him. Let's think why: 1. They are completely incompetent (your choice) or 2. The only one getting Ayton to focus was Chris Paul,...
Oh look, he just scored again. Boy, is England glad they've got Harry Kane!
Oh look, Harry Kane, playing in his 100th game for England, just scored a thumping goal.
[MEDIA]
BORING! You're certainly no Stephen A. Smith.
So it's the chemistry. But also the talent. So if there's good chemistry does that mean the players suddenly got more talented? And was Boris Diaw...
If there's anything that could get me on board with full tank it's the threat that that's the alternative.
I'm happy with just keeping Clingan and Duop...
I guess we'll see, won't we.
If you think that that means that Ayton is suddenly desirable to other teams, then I don't know what to tell you.
Get this guy before the Spurs do...
That's the reality of the salary cap.
Clingan and Williams are just as good.
This is what is known as damning with faint praise.
No, they 100% would not, because of his salary.
He's not a better defender than Williams. Or three point shooter than Reath. He's certainly PAID more than the others.
Ayton is amazing in theory, but just seems to lack "it". He's too passive. Which is why we're probably stuck with him, as I just can't see anyone...
Clingan obviously. But why Ayton? Simply because you can't get value for him?
Which one should go, and where?
Separate names with a comma.
