Good grief. Dial back the righteous indignation a couple of clicks. I’m only giving you my take on what kinds of things are typically discussed at...
When was the last time you saw a player introduction PC in Portland, Oregon turn into an event raking the GM over the coals about cap issues? New...
You guys act like local media are interested in writing stories that appeal to the .1% of Blazers fans who are CBA nerds. They want human interest...
Probably, at least until after Christmas. If they play hardball and don't play much ala Simmons, the Nets will be forced to get more realistic.
You have to figure that the absolute most that Bledsoe would get would be the Taxpayer MLE. So, $6.5M - $1.8M Vets Min)/2 = $2.35M max savings?
Tough choice...Raymond Felton?? I'll go with Seth Curry.
The opinion part is your statement that signing Payton and forgoing using Bledsoe’s contract indicates the team isn’t dedicated to winning.
Okay, I agree that it was possible, but not likely, that both could have been used had they not signed Payton. The second part is opinion. I think...
Man, time does move on quickly. RIP, Mike.
I think the plan is to use Hart to obtain another big. Adding Payton and keeping Hart doesn’t make much sense.
We always knew that if Simons and Nurk were re-signed there would only be room to use one of the TPE or Bledsoe’s contract. Obviously, the TPE was...
Congrats. You must be a proud pop.
And that's just from the Covid.
I never said it was good to be hard capped. I only said that there are still deals that can be made to balance the roster…which is the point of this...
I would like to keep Hart around too, but remember he’s on a one year deal and, if he works out, is going to want to be paid next year. How is that...
Oh, now you’re just being fussy. The point is that there are likely a lot of one-for-one deals that could be made under the hard cap for guys with...
Separate names with a comma.
