Why, simply because I challenged what someone said? (....which was totally untrue, by the way.) Then bagged on sly, thinking he was rushing to defend...
Do the liberals have anyone on-deck to replace this train deck? I hope so. But who?!
Uh oh. Me smells the great reset.
It also works that way with rental properties. jus sayin
http://www.sportstwo.com/threads/musk-twitter-the-great-experiment.375233/page-10 Twitter board announces poison pill measure to block Musk buyout A...
Is this the pic? [IMG]
[ATTACH]
Well, good golly, then. My bad.
Not at all. Again, I replied to crandc. slydog rushed to her defense. As per usual.
No.
That's funny right there.
This is what crandc said: I simply disagreed. Charlie Kirk did not "blame" inflation on transgender people. He made two separate comparisons....
There's fake news on all sides. It is what it is.
I didn't want to start a whole new thread on it, so I borrowed from sly. Threads wend their way into obscurity in here, so it really doesn't matter.
That would be ludicrous and he's not an idiot.
Fine. Just don't say Charlie Kirk is blaming inflation on transgenders. Therein lies the lie.
You people. I had already seen that. There's a CLEAR difference between "connecting" (in whatever way) and "blaming".
Well, you just did.
I remember the fresh battered Walla Walla's @ Burgerville. Heavenly!
That's racist.
Separate names with a comma.
