https://www.healthline.com/health/eye-health/lasik-for-astigmatism#takeaway
I’m in the “have to see it before I know it” camp. I think Dame is a great enough player that he can mesh with Ant without any problems. I think Ant...
I think I’m going to have a damned difficult time forgetting this February.
Suddenly the Blazers are badasses.
I can’t answer that due to board policies on personal insults.
I think that’s true as well. As far as I’m concerned, PER is interesting, but not a definitive measure of a player’s value. But that’s probably true...
[IMG]
The screen shot of Shaboid's avatar and screen name isn't a picture? That was the joke I was making. You do realize that I'm just messing with you...
Well, duh. But poor teams do have some good players and the question I have with the stat is whether there's an inherent bias in PER towards rating...
Boo! My picture should have won for its mix of creativity and snark. Chris Craig is the Russian judge. ;)
My thought is that positive stats like assists are easier to get when you’re playing with better players. I’d think that negative defensive stats...
“What do you mean I’m playing center?”
Did he play Dance Dance Revolution?
Have you tried the Hobo Hoagie?
If Looking at that list, the players with high PER are almost exclusively good players on good teams. I suspect that PER isn’t as good at...
Better yet, look at PER and realize it's a crappy stat.
Isn’t that two games in a row of Hart with the MJ numbers?
On the Grayson Allen question, I needed an option for, “No, but I think he has a very punchable face.”
So, looks like Cronin's built a contender.
CJ who?
Separate names with a comma.
