What is your example of a side pick and roll? Because I see pick and roll from the wing.
This is a stupid comment with no truth behind it. Why say dumb things?
Only that that's not the offense. It isn't even a weave. They're multiple dribble hand offs, out of which you attack. And it's great offense.
Go to 1:49. @hoopsjock illustrates what I'm talking about: [MEDIA]
I can't. I'm working on Saturday and my birthday is on Sunday.
Hero ball is iso ball. Posting up is just an iso play. An inefficient one at that. Nurk should be in the high post finding cutters.
Nik? Why? Lol
Right. So you could see the thread made by @Wizard Mentor. Simple mistake @H.C.
You may be mistaken. Does @KingSpeed have @Wizard Mentor on ignore? Because that's who started that thread. Truthfully, I don't even think he has...
Sorry, nobody's gonna tell me when and when I can't make a thread so I won't advocate that for another. He didn't break any forum rules making this...
This is not always true. And why would the extra 10 seconds when a foul only resets the shot clock to 14 if it's under 14? If the shot clock is...
What? This is a valid thread. It's about basketball and It effects our team. And not only that, the link is not from his Twitter. He mentions nothing...
What are you talking about? You're misinterpreting the change. • "A personal foul is committed on any offensive player during his team's transition...
Statisticians/clock managers already suck. This is gonna make their jobs even harder.
Depends on your view of what "ill effects" are. I don't like that you don't really get the option of running a full set if there's a kick out. It...
I disagree. I think these rule change suggestions deserve their own thread. For the record, I'm not in agreement with the reset to 14.
Would Calabro be there? Would I get a chance to tell that MF not to EVER say: "Sets his tootsies" "To the cup" " Snuggles it in" Or tell him...
I'll tell you a story soon. I'll pm it to you.
What's funny is now they claim we have: "Trump Derangement Syndrome" No.... That would be THEM!
You like that? :lol:
Separate names with a comma.