Well, if there is a chance they will not match and this is the guy you want, as might be the case with Sessions - it is worth a try, I suspect.
If he can run the offense and score as a backup without defending anyone - it will be an upgrade on our outgoing backup PG... Honestly - he seems...
Could it be because Jordan did not have to pay $5.5m for the honor of playing for Chicago?
How much longer do we need to carry this bum on the roster? :devilwink:
When he heard he will have to fight Patty Mills for minutes. Duh.
Probably to see if playing extended minutes next to Rudy will revive his career, which it has, for a bit - to the tune that we got to move up from 38...
I do not like Deng's contract one bit - but - since we will be over the cap going forward anyway - and we do get Hinrich which is a big upgrade in...
This is none-sense. The kid will be in a huge financial loss (based on his buy-out) - to go play in the NBA, the T-Wolves were aware of the...
I do not like Deng's contract - but for this package - it's a steal.
Thanks for the mental picture. That was funny.
You are my hero, sir! :cheers:
Wow. That's a lot of people really liking Adam Morrison! :ohno:
Well, if you did that... no more rings for you!
Sessions... But my gut feeling is that the big catch will be via a trade - whatever FA we sign will be for a lesser role (like backup PF).
Jarret Jack works for Indiana just fine - as their backup PG. It was a .400 team that won .480 when he was on the court and sounds like he is more...
He comes into an almost ideal situation. Their incumbent is a crappy PG, their draft pick PG is a combo guard freshman. If he can not make it happen...
So that's why we did not get Beno Udrih for Sergio... It all makes sense now :cheers:
I do not care if you like spongebob or not - but Mr. Mills was born to be called a Crabby Patty... Someone needs to take this picture: [img]...
We already have 3 with Crabby Patty Mills. I too, guess, that if we are getting a nice upgrade in PG - it means that Blake and his expiring contract...
See - but here is where your argument fails - you argue that statistics show that stars at lower levels are more likely to succeed in the next level...
Separate names with a comma.
