$10,000 To Disprove Genesis

Technically speaking, a snake is not a serpent, though.

 

I still chuckle at the thought of the Land of Confusion video

 

Your way is much faster than mine. Disproving any tiny part disproves Genesis. So it could meet the time limit of $10,000 in attorney fees and be cost-effective.

Methusaleh couldn't live 900 years because humans can't do that.

 

Really? Prove it, then.

 

You're going to lose at this. Vocal cords could have existed then. You just lost your chance at $10,000.

 

Courts rely upon expert testimony everyday from physiologists, biologists, chemists, etc. 100% of them will testify that a human couldn't have lived that long.

Just hand me my $10,000 now so I don't have to embarrass you.

 

These are pathetic attempts that aren't going to get you anywhere. You're trying to build a proof based on an assumption.

 

Heh, that's something Whitsitt might say.

 

technically speaking? explain.

 

To disprove Genesis, you need only disprove any tiny part of it. A quick disproof is the opposite of building a proof.

As for assumptions, that's how legal decisions are made. (See my posts in today's Amanda Knox thread.)

 

You can find it...if you really wanted to. I simply don't feel like handing you 10 thousand bucks right now.

 

No proof has ever been offered that smoking has caused even a single case of cancer.

It is merely a politically motivated assumption based on junk science.

 

That sounds like an admission that you don't buy the genesis story.

 

William lane Craig convinced a Oxford panel of 300 mixed atheists and agnostics that God is not a delusion. You think it's easy to disprove anything? I think not.

 

You're right, MARIS, I don't buy it at all, In fact, it's a free gift.

 

Boy, you Christians are a slippery bunch.

 

hmmm, i see technically that they are, so.....i dunno

 

I was slopeful you'd catch that hint of wit.

 

An agnostic is incapable of independent reasoning and decision making.

I have no idea what a mixed atheist is.