Yeah, yeah.. Talk all the f*cking trash you want about the guy. But if we had a 100 percent Hughes, this series would be different. No freaking doubt about it.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (CavsRules @ Jun 13 2007, 01:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Yeah, yeah.. Talk all the f*cking trash you want about the guy. But if we had a 100 percent Hughes, this series would be different. No freaking doubt about it.</div>Hahahahaha I sense a little anger...Hughes wouldnt make much of a difference...Tony Parker would just score more...
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jjdaman20 @ Jun 13 2007, 01:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Hahahahaha I sense a little anger...Hughes wouldnt make much of a difference...Tony Parker would just score more...</div>And how would you know? Larry Hughes had one freaking foot, and Tony Parker is the 2nd fastest point guard in the NBA. Is this a joke?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (CavsRules @ Jun 13 2007, 01:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>And how would you know? Larry Hughes had one freaking foot, and Tony Parker is the 2nd fastest point guard in the NBA. Is this a joke?</div>I'm referring to a healthy Larry Hughes...like you proclaim would have changed the outcome of this Finals...
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (CavsRules @ Jun 13 2007, 01:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>And how would you know? Larry Hughes had one freaking foot, and Tony Parker is the 2nd fastest point guard in the NBA. Is this a joke?</div>No, but come on now... Larry Hughes would be a nice addition, but Cleveland still wouldn't have won this series, or even come close to it, even if he was 100%.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (CelticBalla32 @ Jun 13 2007, 01:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>No, but come on now... Larry Hughes would be a nice addition, but Cleveland still wouldn't have won this series, or even come close to it, even if he was 100%.</div>Thats all I'm tryna say...but CavsRules is gettin mad about it...
I'm not getting 'mad' about it... I'm stating this series would be much different. We wouldn't be down 0-3 right now, and thats for damn sure.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GArenas @ Jun 12 2007, 11:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I'm just wondering if anyone here is entertained by Mark Jackson and Jeff Van Gundy. At times they can be quite annoying but so can most broadcasters. (The "you sound like a coach" thing is getting repetetive") I personally enjoy their broadcasting and think that JVG brings some interesting ideas to the table.</div>I think Van Gundy is a total breath of fresh air. He's the only guy I've enjoyed listening to outside of Hubie Brown. He keeps it somewhat real. All the other announcers seem to do nothing but fawn over the superstars and belittle everything the other players do, to the point (in the Cavs case) that they essentially attribute every positive play made to LeBron James.I also like the way ABC puts up a graphic listing all the Cavaliers players (other than LeBron) under the heading "Role Players." What kind of crap is that? These aren't bench guys, they are the starters for that team. Ilgauskas is not a "role player." If he is, then so is James. All the players on every team play a certain role, but calling them "role players" implies that they are scrubs, which is not true.